‘You STILL Ain’t Forgiven for Your Kobe Comments’: Gayle King Called Out for Past Kobe Remarks While Defending Oprah Against Cindy Crawford’s ‘Chattel’ Claims

Gayle King is sticking beside her best friend Oprah Winfrey in the wake of unflattering comments.

Supermodel Cindy Crawford fueled a debate among fans when a clip of her reflecting on an uncomfortable appearance on the media maven’s hit talk show more than three decades ago began to circulate.

According to the fashion industry veteran, she was mortified when Winfrey encouraged her to stand up and flaunt her model physique during a 1986 interview.

“This is unbelievable. Stand up just a moment, cause no one saw you come in. Now this is what I call a body,” said the talk-show host as she and the audience admired the then-20-year-old’s physique.


Gayle King slams ‘disappointing’ Cindy Crawford for calling out her bestie Oprah Winfrey over ‘chattel’ comment. Photos: Oprahdaily/Instagram; Cindycrawford/Instagram

In the resurfaced clip featured in the Apple TV+ docuseries “The Super Models,” Crawford explained that in hindsight, the encounter left her feeling “like the chattel or a child, be seen and not heard. When you look at it through today’s eyes, Oprah’s like, ‘Stand up and show me your body. Show us why you’re worthy of being here.”

When asked what she thought of Crawford’s remarks, King told “Entertainment Tonight” that she was aware of the buzz surrounding the program, which debuted in September, but that she had not watched it for herself yet.

“But I’m surprised and a little disappointed because I know Cindy’s been on her show many, many, many times, and it has always been a pleasant experience,” added the long-time “CBS Mornings” co-anchor. “I would hate to think that something that happened years ago—number one, I don’t know quite what it is. I have to see it.”

King and Winfrey have been close friends since meeting in 1976. The network journalist has been by the mogul’s side through countless enduring times, and this one is no different.

Defending the billionaire businesswoman, King said, “I’m sure it would be, ‘Hey, you look so great.’ I can’t imagine Oprah would want anybody, Cindy, or anybody to say, ‘Here, stand up, let us take a look at you.’ It’s not Oprah’s thing to humiliate or make anybody feel badly. But as far as I know, everything is good between Oprah and Cindy.”

Among the reactions to King’s remarks, someone wrote on Instagram, “One thing about Gayle she’s gonna go up for her bestie. Another took offense to Crawford’s use of the word chattel, writing, “Cindy comparing herself to an enslaved person at the slave auction is crazy.”

And another mentioned King’s own problematic 2020 interview when she asked Lisa Leslie if Kobe Bryant’s legacy was tarnished by his 2003 sexual assault case. That person wrote, “Well Gayle, you STILL ain’t forgiven for your Kobe comments when you interviewed sis!!”

Watch Gayle King’s Kobe Bryant interview with Lisa Leslie here.

Winfrey spoke out in defense of her pal amid the interview backlash. She was nearly moved to tears. The OWN Network founder publicly has not addressed the blowback from Crawford’s comments, but the archived interview since has been removed from YouTube.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top