‘I Don’t Owe Her S—t’: Kandi Burruss Says She Will Never Have a ‘Conversation’ with Ex-Friend Phaedra Parks for Starting Nasty ‘Dungeon’ Rumor About Her and Porsha Williams, Despite Fans’ Requests

Kandi Burruss has no plans to extend an olive branch to her friend turned nemesis Phaedra Parks.

The two women had a contentious falling out during the season-nine reunion of “The Real Housewives of Atlanta,” when it was revealed that the attorney was behind a rumor alleging that Burruss and her husband, Todd Tucker, planned to drug and sexually assault Porsha Williams.

It Was a Compliment and a Shade at the Same Time': Kandi Burruss Responds to Comments from 'Shade Queen' Phaedra Parks
Kandi Burruss (left) says she has no plans on having a sit down with Phaedra Parks (right) after she started a nasty rumor about her and Porsha Williams. (Pictured: Kandi Burruss (left) @kandi/Instagram; @phaedraparks/Instagram)

Williams famously confronted Burruss about the “sex dungeon” claims, but throughout the season, the cast was left in the dark about from whom or where Williams got the false story. During the reunion, the Go Naked Hair company founder admitted that Parks, her friend, had told her about the claims.

The Southern Belle played coy and insisted that she did not know the slanderous gossip was untrue and that she was only trying to help Williams. After the controversy, Parks was not asked to return to the franchise.

But fans have hoped that she and Burruss would one day make amends. The Grammy-winning songwriter feels differently.

“I don’t owe her s—t and I would say that to anybody. Not a motherf—king thing. I don’t owe her s—t; she will never get s—t from me,” said Burruss during an episode of “Speak On It With Jay. “You can’t defend yourselves against blatant liars, or people who are so spiteful that will make up anything to tear you down and then hide.”

Despite viewers feeling they were robbed of one last conversation regarding the lie, Burruss was adamant that she has nothing else to say. The entrepreneur further claimed her ex-friend may have played a role in delaying the opening of her and Tucker’s second restaurant, Blaze Steak & Seafood.

In 2021, the establishment struggled to open its doors due to a failed inspection and issues with obtaining its liquor license. At the “RHOA” reunion, Parks asked how things were going with the restaurant.

“When she did that, I knew that she had something to do with it ‘cause she was cool with the person who had to sign off [on the license],” explained Burruss.

Social media users, however, share a wide range of opinions on the women’s severed friendship. “Kandi went low and then Phaedra went to hell,” wrote one person about jabs each of the women threw that season.

“She said “I see you, we see eachother” WE GOOD,” wrote a second user.

A third person said, “But kandi can hang with porsha?! Make it make sense.”

And a fourth commented, “After those allegations Kandi don’t ever have to speak to Phaedra again. Period.”

In past interviews, Parks has likened “RHOA” to a “sinking ship” and expressed that she has no interest in making a return. She instead is joining season 10 of Bravo’s other popular series, “Married to Medicine,” which returns this fall.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top