8 Celebrities Who Suffered Embarrassing Lace Front Wig Mishaps

Lace-front wigs are an unfortunate staple for some Black women. Lace fronts are often a quick fix, they shield one’s own hair from damage, and if applied properly give the appearance of a natural hairline.

However, there are serious health problems associated with this style choice that deflate all of the conveniences.

For instance, to keep the wig in place, the lace has to be applied around the edges and nape of the neck with either adhesive or highly toxic glue. The application of either can cause hair loss, bacterial infection and skin discoloration.

Aside from those risks, aesthetically, lace fronts often fall short of achieving a polished look.

There are many photos circulating on the Internet of the women we adore with embarrassing glue marks, hairlines hovering just above their eyebrows and altogether unnatural appearances.

Here are eight celebrity women who we encourage to ditch lace fronts for healthier, better looking style options.

Photo: Beyonce Now

Beyonce

When you are a high-profile singer like Beyonce, hair faux pas are not good for business. Her puckered skin from glue around her temples, illustrated in this photo, looks pretty painful. It’s also an embarrassing reason for her fans to remember her performance.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top