My Boyfriend of Three Months Is Demanding That We Move In Together, or He’ll Dump Me

My current boyfriend and I have had a colorful past. We met in our teens and were both living idyllic lives. Neither of us was really into being in a committed relationship, as evidenced by our tendency to end up being each other’s side piece. It would happen the same way every single time. Basically, I would be dating someone and run into him, and he would be dating someone, too. Still, we’d start talking and kicking it on the side.

But this time was very different. My best friend and I were out at a lounge, and as soon as we were walking up to the door, I saw him — working security. I was flustered and nervous because it had been years since we had been together. We exchanged pleasantries and numbers and, soon after that, started dating. I’m happier than I’ve been with a guy in years, and he seems happy, too. But now he’s starting to apply pressure. He wants me to move in with him.

Stock image of couple arguing. (Photo: Pexels.com)

I can’t for the life of me figure out why he wants me to move in so badly outside of him wanting to be able to watch my every move and control me. He claims it’s not at all about control and that he has always been adamant about living with his woman. I told him that maybe if things go well and we end up engaged or married, then, yes, I’ll move in for sure. But for now, it has only been three months, and my family frowns upon shacking up.

Trending Today:

Yesterday, my boyfriend and the love of my life gave me a straight-up ultimatum. He told me that either I move in with him in the next 30 to 45 days or it’s over. I can’t believe it. Maybe I’m looking at it the wrong way, and I should be honored that he would want us to live together. Most guys shy away from that sort of thing until they’re forced to have to live together. I don’t know what to do, and I’m afraid to lose him. Should I start packing to start shacking or continue to hold true to my own values and morals and not move in with him, even at the risk of losing my relationship?

Read the original story here.

The Center gets to the heart of the lifestyle, parenting, relationships and finance conversations impacting the culture. Convene here to express and share personal and poignant points of view that arise in everyday life.

Send us your queries to [email protected] and let our readers offer some perspectives on how to navigate these conversations.

Never miss a story — sign up for ATLANTA BLACK STAR’S free daily newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest developments, from top news headlines to celebrity news.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top