‘RHOP’ Stars Gizelle Bryant and Robyn Dixon Dismiss Candiace Dillard’s Previous ‘Light-Skinned Privilege’ Claim Against Their Cast Mate Ashley Darby

“Real Housewives of Potomac” stars Gizelle Bryant and Robyn Dixon addressed Candiace Dillard’s “light-skinned privilege” remarks toward their co-star Ashley Darby on July 9 during an interview with The Jasmine Brand. This initial interview came two days before the season 6 premiere of the hit Bravo series, which aired this past weekend. 

When Bryant and Dixon were asked to express their feelings about Dillard’s statements — which she shared last month under a fan page’s video compilation of “RHOP” best fights — both women agreed that the actress’ opinions were unjustified. Bryant quickly uttered, “It was stupid.” 

Robyn Dixon and Gizelle Bryant (left, right in left photo) slammed Candiace Dillard (center photo) over a social media quip she made a month ago about her “RHOP” co-star Ashley Darby (right) benefiting from light-skin privilege when it comes to fan criticism. (Photos: @robyndixon10/Instagram, @candeegal09/Indtagram, @ashleyboalchdarby/Instagram)

The 50-year-old further explained her stance while using herself and Dixon, who are both of lighter tones, as examples. She said, “I’ll tell you why. Who gets the most shade? Who gets the most backlash? Who gets the most hateration? This girl or this girl?”

Dixon then joined the conversation by saying, “And Ashley! Ashley spent three seasons being dragged by the fans and the only reason why she recently fell into better favor of the fans is [because] we got to see a different side of her as a mother. So I think people have short memories. Candiace’s memory is a little short, but Ashley has definitely paid her dues.”

Candiace Dillard credits Ashley Darby’s “light-skinned privilege” for the main reason why Darby doesn’t receive criticism from “Real Housewives of Potomac” fans underneath an All True Tea post that showed a compilation of “RHOP” iconic fight scenes. @alltruetea/Instagram

Toward the end of the interview, Bryant shared that Dillard receives a lot more criticism from fans because of her words, not any colorism bias. “If we are just gonna talk about Candiace and Ashley. Ashley does not say half the things that Candiace says that were bad.” The mother of three wrapped it up by saying that Dillard deserves all the flak she has been getting. 

Dillard initially stated her “light-skinned” privilege claim on June 6 in response to an Instagram user @1classyladydc who pointed out the several instances in an All True Tea compilation post where Darby made “reckless” statements but faced no backlash. The social media user wrote: “This reel shows how reckless Ashley’s mouth has been and still is. Yet Candiace was the villain and ganged up on by so many fans. It’s crazy how Ashley was, in my opinion, worse, but people want to ignore that. I wonder why????” 

Dillard replied, “Because she’s light-skinned. There. It was said. I said it. Now, let’s see how fast it gets around.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top