Evelyn Lozada Posts Bloody Photo, Blasts Tami Roman for Hitting Below Belt About Chad Johnson Abuse

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bkf-ue7F3zT/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=1ta06r7pyi1sk

A teaser for next week’s “Basketball Wives” reveals a stunning conversation between Evelyn Lozada and Tami Roman and it prompted the “Livin’ Lozada” star to speak out about her domestic violence experience.

In a text thread, Lozada told Roman she’s a “liar,” presumably for her involvement in spreading a rumor about Shaunie O’Neal’s ex. Then, Roman tells Lozada she “lied on Chad,” remarking on her accusations of domestic abuse against ex-Bengals player Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson in 2012.

“I lied on Chad?” Lozada asked before Roman hit below the belt and responded, “You know you was fighting that man all along.”

“WHAT?” a stunned Lozada replied.

The back and forth, which will be discussed in detail in the episode, prompted Lozada to blast her co-star in a set of tweets.

Another Twitter user backed up the star. User @sunshynelyn510 proclaimed “we all saw the photos of that huge gash that man made in her forehead and we heard the 911 call the neighbor made when Evelyn had to run” adding “Tami sooooo wrong.”

“She’s GROSS!!!!!!!!!!!!” Lozada said.

When another fan expressed disbelief in the fact that Roman brought up Lozada’s abuse, Lozada simply said Roman “don’t care — her goal is to try to ruin me.”

Lozada’s tweets clearly show her emotion, but it was her lengthy Instagram post, which was later deleted, that put things on full display.

“The victim blaming culture discourages DV victims from coming forward,” she wrote in the caption of a series of photos showing her wounds allegedly from her husband of 41 days. “The fear of being judged and shamed is enough to make anyone stay quiet and suffer in silence — so coming out is a HUGE deal! Shaming directed at the survivor is just WRONG on so many levels. The mindset of anyone who would think that the one being abused did something to incite the situation unsettles me! When someone builds up enough courage to speak their truth — they should be believed and supported. And for those that choose to victim blame — pause and think about the inner turmoil and emotional conflict you can potentially cause for the survivor.

“For me, as a DV survivor, I chose to use my experience to personally evolve and I’ve learned that there is light at the end of the darkest tunnel. I know that all DV situations are different. In my case, it was the love and support our families and a willingness and concerted effort by both of us to heal; my ex and I coexist, harbor no ill will and have moved forward… #StopVictimBlaming #DVisReal #ThinkBeforeYouAct #LozadaCares #LivingInMyTruth 💜💜💜💜💜💜.”

In response, several fans rallied around Lozada and dissed Roman in the process.

“I am so disgusted with @tamiroman this season … so much so that I am actually starting to like the new @jackiechristie 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️.”

“You are and always would be a survivor, keep the faith and block all the negative 👎🏼 people out… #tamiroman messy arse.”

“Tami sitting back acting like she revived all while she’s messy as f—. Ghetto ass had some nerve. Somebody need to wack her ass SMDH.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top