Rachel Lindsey’s Swift and Epic Response Prompts ‘The Bachelor’ Alum to Delete Racist Tweet

“The Bachelorette” star Rachel Lindsay (left) referenced the racist tweets one of her suitors posted for the first time during an online spat with “The Bachelor” alum Leah Block. (ABC)

Current star of “The Bachelorette” Rachel Lindsay and “The Bachelor” alum Leah Block got into a mini war of words after the latter tweeted a racist statement about Lindsay’s suitors.

Block tweeted and quickly deleted something her roommate said as she watched the Monday, June 19, episode of “The Bachelorette” but not before Lindsay issued a slick reply.

Lindsay’s tweet referenced one of her suitors, Lee Garrett, who drew attention in May when racist tweets bashing Black Lives Matter surfaced, while Block’s roommate seemed to be describing the diverse cast on this season of “The Bachelorette.”

After Twitter users got fired up over the tweet, Block said her statement was interpreted the wrong way and Lindsay once again responded.

Block’s Twitter account is no longer active and people have been schooling and mocking her since the tiff began.

Others have applauded Lindsay.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top