Black Women Race to Highlight ‘The Color Purple’ After Elizabeth Banks Ignored It In Critique of Steven Spielberg

Elizabeth Banks criticized the lack of women represented in Hollywood movies, both on camera and behind the scenes.
(David Shankbone)

Actress Elizabeth Banks criticized director Steven Spielberg for not having a female lead in his films and Black women were not here for it, swiftly pointing out “The Color Purple” as an example.

“I went to [see] ‘Indiana Jones’ and ‘Jaws’ and every movie Steven Spielberg ever made, and by the way, he’s never made a movie with a female lead,” TheWrap reported Banks as saying while accepting an award from the non-profit group Women in Film Wednesday, June 14.

“Sorry, Steven. I don’t mean to call your ass out, but it’s true.”

When an audience member pointed out 1985’s “The Color Purple,” which starred Whoopi Goldberg and Oprah Winfrey, Banks moved on from the topic.

Many Twitter users took issue with Banks.

https://twitter.com/bravenak/status/875340115857428480

https://twitter.com/SigmaR3LLA/status/875341475499921408

https://twitter.com/EricHaywood/status/875340958790852609

In response to Banks’ statement, IndieWire Editor-at-Large Anne Thompson tweeted the Oscar-nominated film flopped before a responder questioned her.

The correction didn’t stop people from slamming Thompson.

https://twitter.com/NerdAboutTown/status/875344683999932416

https://twitter.com/freeblackgirl/status/875327736956452865

https://twitter.com/crissles/status/875341271249891329

https://twitter.com/ShaylaRacquel/status/875340512420663296

https://twitter.com/darleneturner53/status/875349088270790657

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top