Trump’s administration’s intent was clear: to direct the American people’s attention to the big event and away from disapproving reports.
Trump supporters tweeted reactions like, “UFC at the White House is wild. Are we getting a special fight card, or is this a massive fitness and sports diplomacy event? Either way, I’m tuned in!” and “Yes, I think it will be lively.”
However, an overwhelming outcry from others reveals more critical takeaways.
“Are you not entertained?,” wrote one X user. Another tweeted, “It’s gonna go DOWN in history as one of the stupidest events to ever grace the White House lawn. Or what’s left of it anyway.”
But it backfired once people realized the timing of his event and what he didn’t want discussed.
Two others posted, “Trailer park trash on the WH lawn. Happy 250th” and “I don’t think that’s how taxpayers want their money spent.”
Other comments leaned more into Trump’s tone-deaf remarks that heavily impact struggling Americans due to the rising cost of living.
“No one gives a s—t about your circuses when we can’t afford bread,” read one reminder. “No food, no money, no healthcare, but you get a UFC fight,” said another person.
Critics say the UFC spectacle is distracting from the ongoing conflict with Iran, which Trump repeatedly promised would end quickly.
Plans to move forward with the face-off coincide with Trump writing on Truth Social, “Israel and Iran must immediately stop ‘shooting.’’”
Trump involved the U.S. in Israel’s attack on Iran on Feb. 28. At one point, he claimed the war was a victory and, in separate instances, promised it would be over soon.
His tactic to shift headlines from the Middle East conflict has also included talking about building a White House ballroom and remodeling of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool — both projects face public disapproval.
Additional social media user reactions include, “A fight on the White House lawn does NOT promote peace or unity. The message is violence. And it certainly is NOT family friendly. This administration is tone deaf to the needs and sacrifices of every day Americans.”
Along with, “Taxpayer-funded octagon in the Rose Garden? Billions in debt, wars brewing, and this is the priority? Embarrassing.”
Pentagon officials reportedly advised producers to recruit fit servicemen to stand in as audience members.
The leaked requirement ignited a firestorm of backlash, especially among those who argue Trump has disrespected the military and soldiers slain during his war.
A detractor also alluded to UFC being a money grab for Trump.
They tweeted, “Absolutely tone deaf. Is AMERICA invited to this limited event? NO! So why keep promoting it to Americans? Its for #PedoPOTUS’s rich donors & self enrichment with his cronies. Disgusting.”
Watchdog group Public Integrity Project filed a lawsuit alleging that the martial arts face-off violates National Park Service regulations and that Congress did not approve the construction of the oversized octagon.
The plaintiffs, a veteran and an activist, hope the filing will stop the fight from taking place.
“Just like all things trump…tacky, very tacky. and to put it in the front yard of OUR White House, so very disrespectful of the currently WH squatters,” quipped one person.
Another said, “it’s just going to get worse from here.”
The Trump administration claims the event was “properly permitted” and has not been canceled.
Independent journalism still matters.
We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.
Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.
The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.
We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.
If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.