Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Entertainment/Celebrity News
Celebrity NewsEntertainmentNHE

‘Wow’: Gavin Newsom’s Latest Shot at Trump Backfires on Pete Hegseth Too, Leaving Fans Zooming In on the Unexpected Twist and Laughing at the Fallout

Posted byBy Angelina Velasquez | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

Pete Hegseth tried to lay down the law on military fitness, but his tough talk instantly backfired. His remarks that “fat troops” and “fat generals” have no place in the ranks sparked a firestorm online—one that quickly turned its focus to Donald Trump’s waistline.

It didn’t take long for the internet to turn Hegseth’s message upside down with memes that dragged Trump’s waistline, and Gavin Newsom piled on with a savage jab that left the president humiliated.

Trump finally responded to Newsom’s trolling after the California governor mocked his press secretary, but critics say he can’t take what he dishes out. (Photo by Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Times)

Hegseth is rolling out mandates to ensure each branch of the U.S. military is in tip-top shape at all times. On Sept. 30, he delivered remarks to top defense personnel during a meeting held at the Marine Corps Museum in Quantico, Virginia.

‘Ain’t No Way’: Donald Trump’s Claims the Same Height and Weight as This Pro Athlete, But the Photos Tell a Completely Different Story

His initiatives will require all ranks to adhere to height and weight standards and undergo physical testing twice a year. “If the secretary of war can do regular hard PT, so can every member of our joint force,” said Hegseth.

He also expects active-duty enlistees to commit to training on all workdays. The through line is clear: Those who do not fall in line have no place in the military. “Frankly, it’s tiring to look out at combat formations, or really any formation, and see fat troops,” the former Army National Guardsman said.

“Likewise, it’s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon and leading commands around the country and the world. It’s a bad look.”

However, Hegseth’s declaration to bolster improved physical fitness inadvertently made him and the president of the United States a target of ridicule, as the above video shows Hegseth struggling to complete a pull-up.
While Hegseth’s fitness fail drew laughs, much of the online heat quickly shifted to Trump himself, with critics zeroing in on his own fitness and fast-food habits.

“Man banned fat generals but not the Big Mac General in Chief,” quipped an X user. Among those who commented about Donald Trump was his Democratic foe Gov. Gavin Newsom. The California official retweeted a snippet of Hegseth’s speech with a photo of Trump removing his suit jacket while inside a McDonald’s.

The Republican figure has been candid about his affinity for the Golden Arches’ fast food. Newsom wrote, “I guess the Commander in Chief needs to go!”

Fans quickly joked about the image on Threads.

“Wow.”

“Yes! Please get rid of man boobs.”

“Maybe he should do the honorable thing and just resign, like Hegseth told the generals to do.”

MAGA supporters argued that Trump is excluded from Hegseth’s vision of war-ready leaders. He doubled down, sharing an AI photo of an obese Trump double-fisting hamburgers as a drone dropped more bags of McDonald’s.

“He is the CIVILIAN Commander in Chief – and he is held to that standard, for fitness as President of the United States,” read one defense. Those messages were eclipsed by trolling.

A Newsom follower tweeted, “We got the orange flubber blubber that barely made it up the escalator!” in reference to Trump’s U.N. visit, where an escalator abruptly stopped working as soon as he and first lady Melania stepped onto it.

According to the White House, Trump has a perfect bill of health, standing at 6 feet 3 and weighing 224 pounds.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top