Donald Trump’s Co-Defendant Wants Judge to Ease Bond Order So He Can Campaign for Trump’s 2024 Presidential Race

One of the people accused of being part of a scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia has asked the judge presiding over the case to relax his bond conditions so he can work on Donald Trump‘s new presidential campaign.

Harrison Floyd will be tried for racketeering after allegedly working alongside several people, including the former president. Floyd was charged with violating the Georgia RICO Act, conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements and writings, and influencing witnesses.

His bond agreement states that he cannot contact any co-defendant or witness, directly or indirectly, to discuss the case, including Trump.

Donald Trump's Co-Defendant Wants Judge to Ease Bond Order So He Can Campaign for Donald Trump In 2024 Presidential Race
Defendant Harrison Floyd looks on during a hearing in the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump on February 13, 2024, at the Fulton County Courthouse in Atlanta, Georgia. Former US President Donald Trump and 17 others are charged in an indictment that accuses them of illegally conspiring to subvert the will of Georgia voters in the 2020 presidential election. (Alyssa Pointer-Pool/Getty Images)

Floyd’s attorney, Christopher Kachouroff, said at a hearing last week that his client wants those terms eased so he can use X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, “to speak his mind about this case” and to speak with other co-defendants about “his work or matters” outside the case, according to The Hill.

Judge Scott McAfee said he was “open to considering” the request and considering “reasonable restrictions.”

Floyd was already taken to court once by District Attorney Fani Willis last fall when she alleged he violated his bond order by tagging co-defendants and mentioning witnesses in intimidating and threatening social media posts, which amounted to indirect communication.

McAfee ruled that the posts were a “technical violation” of Floyd’s bond order but didn’t jail Floyd over them. He noted that more specific language needed to be included in order to address the “nuances” of social media.

The judge dismissed Willis’ motion and revised Floyd’s bond agreement, prohibiting him from speaking publicly or making social media posts about his co-defendants and witnesses in the case.

Now Floyd wants those amended restrictions eased even further so he can talk about Trump on social media and speak directly to him for “work purposes.” His attorney argued that communication is necessary since he works for the former president as a campaign operative.

McAfee said that he wouldn’t go so far as allowing Floyd to communicate with “any currently indicted co-defendant” since there’s “really no method of oversight,” but said he was willing to consider allowing Floyd to “comment on current events.”

Floyd, the former head of Black Voices for Trump, has pleaded not guilty to the charges he faces in the election subversion case. He’s accused of trying to intimidate and coerce former Georgia election worker Ruby Freeman into falsely admitting that she committed voter fraud during the 2020 election.

No trial date has been set for the case yet.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top