‘I Would Never Speak Like That’: Nia Long Sits Down with Drew Barrymore After Calling Out ‘Charlie’s Angels’ Producers for Rejecting Her for Role Due to Her ‘Sophisticated’ and ‘Old’ Appearance

Can you imagine Nia Long as one of the detectives in the “Charlie’s Angels” films? Well, studio executives certainly were unable to do so.

Long recently revealed that she auditioned for the role of Alex Munday but was ultimately turned down. The actress recalled in an interview with Yahoo Entertainment that she was informed by her agent that the film’s producers “did not want me because they said I looked too sophisticated and too old next to Drew Barrymore.” The role ultimately went to Lucy Liu, whom Long praised for her performance in the comedy-action film series.

Drew Barrymore, Nia Long
(L-R) Drew Barrymore and Nia Long. Photo: The Drew Barrymore Show/YouTube

Still, news of the dismissal struck a nerve with Long’s fans and Barrymore, who brought up the subject again on “The Drew Barrymore Show” on Jan. 26. The “Wedding Singer” star said that she was mortified to learn why Long was rejected.

Long said the rejection was par for the course as an actress; however, the rationale behind their decision to pass on her left a lasting impression. She told Barrymore, “The feedback was, ‘My eyebrows were too sophisticated and I looked too old next to Drew.’ And that was the feedback and I was like, ‘What?’ It just was an odd way of saying you didn’t get the job.”

Barrymore, obviously mortified by Long’s account of how things played out after the audition, acknowledged that she was one of the film’s producers but had nothing to do with the decision. “It’s bewildering to me that someone would say those things,” added the talk show host. “First of all, Nan [Nancy Juvonen, head of Flower Films production company] and I would never talk about eyebrows. That’s not what women would do.”

Barrymore added, “Nan and I would never speak like that, and as far as age, that’s the stupidest thing because you’re actually the same exact number and age as Lucy Liu, so how is that possible?” 

The “Missing” star assured her industry peer that she never felt Barrymore had cost her the gig. Instead, Long thinks Hollywood’s struggle to diversify was ultimately at play. “Now that I’m older and wiser and we’ve been in this business for a long time, I think what was happening during that time is there were all these conversations about diversity, but people weren’t really pulling the trigger,” she explained.

Long continued, “I think this is just a result of the fear of really putting a Black woman into a film that never cast anyone Black.” Her fans agreed that race and Long’s undeniable beauty had to have been determining factors as well.

“Translation they wanted to say she is black and we don’t want a black woman for the part,” wrote one supporter.

“They really thought she is too fine and will take the center role instead of the supporting cast approach. We know the truth,” wrote another.

“They could’ve just said they didn’t want any beautiful brown skin women with curves to show up and show out the other costars…I don’t know what hater drugs the producers were on, because Nia long is gorgeous!!!” commented a third person.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top