Report: Jay-Z’s Financial Transparency Suit Against Bacardi Over D’USSÉ Partnership Started with a $2 Billion Difference of Opinion

There’s reportedly a significant amount of money at stake in Jay-Z’s lawsuit against Bacardi — specifically $1.5 billion, one outlet claims. The 24-time Grammy Award-winning emcee, born Shawn Corey Carter, is currently at odds due to a lack of financial transparency with the spirit giant regarding their 50/50 partnership over the famed D’Ussé cognac brand.

According to TMZ, which broke the story, the Brooklyn native was reportedly prepared to dish out $1.5 billion in order to gain complete ownership of D’Ussé but was rejected. However, it wasn’t the first time the embattled business partners negotiated numbers.

The outlet reported that several months before Jay-Z made his billion-dollar offer, the “Reasonable Doubt” musician and Bacardi exchanged valuations of the company and ultimately realized they were not on the same page. While the emcee felt his half of D’Ussé was worth $2.5 billion, Bacardi thought it was only worth $460 million.

In legal documents obtained by the outlet, the hip-hop mogul subsequently offered to buy out the privately owned company for three times Bacardi’s valuation but to no avail, triggering the emcee to suspect Baccardi was not playing it straight in its valuations.

In October, TMZ reported that in late 2021 the rapper began to exercise his right to to be bought out of their partnership, with an agreement that Bacardi would “negotiate in good faith” to come up with a fair price for the billionaire’s stake in the aged liquor beverage referenced in a number of his projects. 

According to documents obtained by the gossip outlet, SC Liquor claimed Bacardi’s subsidiary, Empire Investments Inc., was trying to “stall and stonewall” them from getting the actual value of D’Ussé. The 52-year-old also accused Bacardi of sabotaging the brand to lower profits.

The “Empire State of Mind” rapper wants a judge to make Bacardi give him full transparency to financial records, “location of all warehouses storing D’Ussé barrels, bottles and accessories,”  and all other documents related to D’Ussé to “protect SC’s rights.”

Recently, Jay-Z’s SC Liquor LLC has been granted an emergency hearing against Bacardi subsidiary Empire Investments Inc. The media outlet reported that according to other legal documents, hearings are slated to begin next month.

The Roc Nation boss’s legal issues came just months after he settled his 2021 NFT dispute with former Roc-A-Fella Records business partner Dame Dash for allegedly attempting to sell the copyright to his debut album “Reasonable Doubt” as a non-fungible token.

Last June, a judge declared that Dame was prohibited from following through with the alleged NFT sale. Furthermore, all parties agree that Roc is the owner of “Reasonable Doubt” and that neither Jay nor Kareem “Biggs” Burke, who all have a 1/3 stake, could attempt to sell their portion of ownership as an NFT. 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top