‘He Didn’t Want Me to Grow at Anything’: Mase Labels Himself ‘Diddy 2.0’ After Fivio Foreign’s Shady Business Claims, Explains His ‘Disdain’ For the Bad Boy Founder 

Mase has been going viral since rapper Fivio Foreign claimed he signed a deal with the veteran rapper for $5,000 on the “Millon Dollaz Worth of Game” podcast last week. This week, the former Bad Boy artist joined hosts Wallo267 and Gillie Da Kid to explain he actually gave Fivio $750,000 in total.

“What he came up here and said was very reckless,” said Mase. “At one time, I gave him $5,000, but I gave him $750,000” 

He Didn?t Want Me to Grow at Anything': Mase Labels Himself 'Diddy 2.0' After Fivio Foreign's Shady Business Claims, Explains His ?Disdain? For the Bad Boy Founder?
Mase (L) and Fivio Foreign (R). Photo by Gilbert Carrasquillo/FilmMagic, Johnny Nunez/WireImage

The 46-year-old claims it was structured “because I set him up to do a deal to where I can control the deal … make the deal what it should be, because I knew if he had the leverage, he would go in there and sell both of us out.”

“Then, when we went in the building, I took $800,000 and he took $700,000,” He continued. “The reason why it went down to $700,000 is because when I gave him $750,000 and I took $750,000, he owed me $50,000.”

Mase explained that $50,000 was payment for the work he put into Fivio’s career before he signed the deal. After the story went viral on social media, the “Harlem World” rapper began trolling the conversation by calling himself “Diddy 2.0” and spelled it out with cash on social media.

He Didn?t Want Me to Grow at Anything': Mase Labels Himself 'Diddy 2.0' After Fivio Foreign's Shady Business Claims, Explains His ?Disdain? For the Bad Boy Founder?
@rsvpmase/Instagram

It’s no secret that Mase has a personal issue with Diddy over shady business deals in the early years of his career. He called out the music mogul on March 2022 diss track, “Oracle 2: Standing on Bodies,” which is the sequel to his 2017 Cam’Ron diss song “The Oracle.” 

Later in the interview, the “Mo Money’ Mo Problems” artist was asked what went down between him and his former label boss.

“Mhmm that’s really good. Let me take my shades off,” Mase began. “Now, I can say this because it’s not something I didn’t say to him. Puff — how do I want to say this? — I feel like I did more than I got credit for, more than I got paid for.”

“I’m trying to be nice,” he added before clearing up details on his “disdain” for Sean “Puffy Daddy” Combs.

“I never got paid what I was worth, and I never got the respect I was worth, so this disdain that I got for Puff is more like you trying to keep me here n——,” he said, gesturing with his hands as if pushing down to the floor.

Mase blames Diddy for holding him back and not allowing him to become a boss like “all my peers.” “He just kept trying to keep me here like he didn’t want me to grow at anything,” he asserted while pointing at the floor.

Further, Mase also mentioned he came up with the lyrics and beat for “Mo Money, Mo Problems” with producer Stevie J. “So just imagine all of these moments that are taken from you. The records, the beats, you ain’t getting the money, you ain’t getting the publishing, you ain’t getting the respect.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top