Successful: Drake Gets Former Home Intruder’s $4 Billion Lawsuit Tossed Out

Drake no longer has to worry about dishing out billions of dollars to a woman who was once arrested for trespassing at his California home. A judge tossed out the massive claim, citing that Mesha Collins failed to present evidence to support her claims against the Grammy winner. 

In a Dec. 17 ruling obtained by Billboard, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Virginia Keeny wrote, “Plaintiff Collins has not demonstrated any of defendant Graham’s statements were about plaintiff Collins or that he used her identity, name, or likeness in his Instagram posts or endorsements.”

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA – OCTOBER 30: Drake speaks onstage during Drake’s Till Death Do Us Part rap battle on October 30, 2021 in Long Beach, California. (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images)

Keeny added that “Even if plaintiff Collins could establish the statements were about her, she has failed to establish that such statements were of a private fact that is offensive and objectionable to the reasonable person.”

The ruling was based on California’s anti-SLAPP law. Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation statutes are intended to prevent people from using courts and potential threats of a lawsuit, to intimidate people who exercise their First Amendment rights. It also allows judges to dismiss meritless cases quickly. 

The “God’s Plan” emcee was hit the suit by Collins last June. The woman accused the actor, whose real name is Aubrey Drake Graham, of using her name and likeness via his social media and product endorsements. 

Drake’s attorney, Stanton “Larry” Stein, called the lawsuit “frivolous” and based on “delusional figments of her imagination.” 

“After trespassing at his home and being arrested in 2017, plaintiff Mesha Collins now attempts to make contact with musician Aubrey Drake Graham by suing him,” Stein wrote in his legal response to Collins’ claim. “This is pure fiction. Until he was served with this lawsuit, Graham had no idea who Collins was.”

In his response, Drake said he didn’t know Collins before her claim. “I do not know Plaintiff. I have never met her and have never communicated with her. I did not even know of Plaintiff until this lawsuit was filed and served. Indeed, I was unaware of Plaintiff’s identity, name, or where she alleges she lives until the filing and service of this lawsuit,” the rapper wrote at the time.  

“In April 2017, somebody broke into my Los Angeles home when I was not there. At the time of that incident, I was not told any details about the trespasser, including her name,” he added. 


More Stories from Our Partners:

‘It’s Because of Astroworld’: Fans React to Drake’s Decision to Withdraw His 2021 Grammy Nominations

‘Losing Eats Away At Your Soul’ | Urban Meyer Apologizes, Speaks About Coaches And Jaguars Issues

Hip-Hop Veteran Ja Rule Gifting His Children NFTs for Christmas to Set Them Up to Make Future Investments


Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top