‘Is This a Joke to You?’: Conservatives Pounce on LeBron James’ Tweet Mocking Kyle Rittenhouse’s Tears During Trial

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is underway in Kenosha County Circuit Court this week. Rittenhouse is on trial for criminal homicide after killing two people and wounding another during social unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last summer.

Rittenhouse took the stand in his own defense on Wednesday, Nov. 10, and seemingly broke down in tears as he gave his account of the night in question.

Video of Rittenhouse breaking down on the stand began to make its way across Twitter and social media, with many people offering up their opinions.

NBA superstar LeBron James jumped into the fray, and he was not buying Rittenhouse’s emotional display. “What tears????? I didn’t see one. Man knock it off! That boy ate some lemon heads before walking into court.”

Not surprisingly, Lebron’s tweet was met with backlash from conservatives who called him out.

City councilman Aaron Carpenter accused ‘Bron of mocking people with PSTD, “LeBron James appears to be mocking people dealing with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in this post. Why? Is this a joke to you? Not a good look!”

Conservative comedians Hodgetwins asked why isn’t the NBA star as vocal about slave labor, “Why aren’t you as vocal about Nike using slave labor?”

Despite the criticism, is LeBron’s social media trolling the right move for such a serious case? Read full story here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top