‘People Want to See Everyone Lose’: Doja Cat Addresses Last Year’s Drama of Being ‘Canceled’ and Called a Racist

A little over a year after Doja Cat went through a period of being “canceled,” the singer-rapper is now explaining her thoughts on cancel culture.

During an interview on “Nick Cannon Radio,” Doja said, “When you get canceled, one, it’s the context. What did you do? So you take what you did; if it is something that’s hurtful towards people you apologize for it and you grow and you move on.”

Doja Cat addresses being canceled last year. (Photo: @dojacat/Instagram)

Doja acknowledged that everyone doesn’t have to accept the apology of a person who has done wrong. She said, it “is completely fair,” but explained to people who have been canceled to be strategic in “how you handle it.” The 25-year-old said, “If you are combative against people who are continuously trying to tear you down it doesn’t benefit you or the other people. People want to see everyone lose; I mean the chaos is entertaining. People have good reason to be upset sometimes and people have no reason to be upset.”

Last year, the “Like That” singer was screen recorded while talking in a public online chat room with alleged white supremacists on a site called TinyChat. In the video, Doja can be heard speaking sexually while dropping the N-word with the hard -er at the end, which prompted a few of the other participants in the group chat to laugh.

On top of that, followers claimed they found more proof of her being a racist after rediscovering her 2015 single “Dindu Nuffin.” The term dindu nuffin is often used by the alternative right group, which is mainly an online group that spread messages on social media supporting white supremacy. The term derives from “didn’t do nothing,” and the group uses it to mock Black people who have been victims of police brutality.

Many believed Doja used the song to mock Sandra Bland, a Black woman who died in 2015 while in police custody under what many think is mysterious circumstances.

This act earned Doja the title of a racist, and a trending spot on Twitter in addition to several people demanding she be canceled. Cancel culture is deemed as an act of justice when people, typically celebrities, commit a wrongful act. The person’s reputation usually gets degraded, and some people choose to stop supporting that person’s work or art.

The next week after fans called for her cancellation, Doja, who is half Caucasian and half South African, uploaded an apology on Instagram. First addressing the public chat rooms she said, “ I shouldn’t have been on some of those chat room sites, but I personally have never been involved in any racist conversations. I’m sorry to everyone I offended.”

The next day on May 25, the “Say So” singer went on Instagram Live to apologize specifically for the song. She said she learned about the word that day and wanted to redefine it. “It was to kind of take back and f—–g just say f–k you to those people. She assured her fans that the song is “in no way connected to police brutality or Sandra Bland.” Doja, born Amala Ratna Zandile Dlamini, added “To see something like that. To see a song, my song, that I made connected to an innocent Black woman’s death is one of the most awful rumors that I’ve ever encountered.”

Since cancel culture began, several “canceled” celebrities, Kevin Hart being one of them, have spoken out to denounce it. Many believe fans have taken it too far and want to cancel them over matters that have no significance.

It looks like all is well with Doja and fans because since the incident she has received a Billboard award, an MTV award, an NAACP award and more.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top