Toni Braxton Says She Regrets Publicly Disclosing Her Anger About Making Alimony Payments

Toni Braxton isn’t typically known for being candid about her personal life, but all that changed last year when she dished on feeling angry about paying alimony to her ex-husband. After a mountain of backlash from opinionated fans and her ex himself, however, Braxton is now saying she wishes she hadn’t been so open.

When the singer visited “Sister Circle” on Jan. 23, she discussed her November chat with her best friend Jada Pinkett Smith. On Smith’s Facebook Watch series “Red Table Talk,” Braxton famously proclaimed, “men are the new b—-es.”

“I think that sometimes when you talk about your personal life you probably shouldn’t if you’re an entertainer,” she says presently. “It opens yourself up to have so many opinions and thoughts. Even though you’re on a talk show and you’re telling a little bit of your secrets or your life, no one knows the entire story. So they’re kind of judging you based on whatever they come up with.

“That can be tough sometimes,” she adds. “And then I have kids, so that makes it more challenging.”

Braxton also stated she’s delved into her personal life “more than I should’ve.”

When discussing going through a divorce on “Red Table Talk” last year, Braxton expressed her problem with having to make alimony payments to Mint Condition singer Keri Lewis, whom she divorced in 2013 after 12 years of marriage.

“Yes. I had to pay alimony. I was one of those girls,” she said. “It’s me, it’s Britney [Spears], it’s Halle [Berry], Mary [J. Blige] is allegedly. I was very, very angry about that. But it was because we had an existing prenup and post-nup. I wanted to renege; I’m going to be honest.”

The disclosure led Lewis, who shares two sons with Braxton, to issue a response of his own after many chided Braxton for her remarks.

“Let me start by saying that I really loved Toni … In addition, when she became ill, I did everything I could to take care of her,” he said on Instagram in December. “To give insight to the alimony payments, Toni’s attorney’s suggested she have a prenuptial agreement put in place prior to our wedding, and they drafted one as they saw fit.”

“Because of my love for her and being optimistic of marriage lasting forever, I didn’t feel the need to have an attorney, as I wasn’t going to contest anything in the prenup,” he added. “Fast-forward to 2012 after separating, I moved out and at some point later, Toni mentioned to me that the payments set in the prenup would start being deposited into my account. I received alimony for around three years between 2012 and 2014.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top