Snoop Dogg Says Affair Between Drake and Kim Kardashian Sparked Beef With Kanye West

Snoop Dogg has a  theory on why Kanye West seemingly has a huge problem with Drake: Because the Canadian rapper slept with Kanye’s wife Kim Kardashian.

Snoop also said the name “Kiki” in Drake’s smash hit “In My Feelings” is actually short for Kim.

Snoop Dogg Says Drake Slept With Kim Kardashian

Instagram

“I may be on the late freight, but I just found out who Kiki was,” said Snoop in an Instagram video. “Kiki is your b—h. That’s why you’re so mad, ‘cause Drake put d–k in your b—h … Drake, you a cold n—–, cuz. I like that song, but I ain’t know why I liked it. I really like it now.”

Snoop isn’t the first person to come up with the KiKi, Kim Kardashian theory. It was a rumor that first swirled when the song dropped in July. In fact, the chatter grew so loud that Kim eventually responded.

“Never happened. End of story,” she wrote on social media.

Kanye also responded to the rumor back in September and blasted Drake for not ending it.

After Snoop’s post, it seems more people found it distasteful than funny. At least based on the comments.

“I don’t see any humor in disrespecting anyone’s mother, especially when they can see this online in the future,” one person wrote.

“He’s out of pocket,” wrote another. “Funny not funny … I’m pissed with Kayne too, but this is wrong.”

“You too old for this bull,” a third person commented. “You have kids and a wife. How would you like it if they were spoken about publicly like that?”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top