Jennifer Hudson’s Ex-Fiance David Otunga Drags Singer’s Sister Into Custody Battle

Child custody proceedings between Jennifer Hudson and ex-fiance David Otunga is getting uglier. Otunga now wants Jennifer’s sister Julia Hudson to answer questions under oath regarding custody the former couple’s 9-year-old son.

The documents obtained by The Blast are sealed so it is unclear what questions will be asked. One can imagine Otunga believes it could help his case.

Jennifer Hudson and David OtungaSince announcing their nearly decade-long engagement was over, both Otunga Jennifer has been slinging mud at each other. TMZ obtained documents back in 2017 where Hudson alleged Otunga exhibited, “aggressive, threatening and harassing behavior toward me. I am now living in fear of further action David might take.”

Otunga’s attorney fired back,”David Otunga has been trying to negotiate the terms of an amicable parenting agreement with Ms. Hudson for several weeks now.” He continued, “However, when it became apparent to Ms. Hudson that Mr. Otunga would be the parent granted residential care of the child, as a result of Mr. Otunga being the child’s primary caregiver while Ms. Hudson pursues her career all over the world, Ms. Hudson decided to file a meritless Petition for Order of Protection in an effort to gain an unfair advantage in the custody dispute.”

Otunga has also accused the singer of trying to defame him. The battle continues for now.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top