Chadwick Boseman Drops Knowledge On Charlamagne About Tracing His Roots

https://www.facebook.com/africanancestry/videos/615488285509861/

“Black Panther” star Chadwick Boseman stopped by “The Breakfast Club” on Valentine’s Day and schooled Charlamagne Tha God on the difference between popular DNA tests.

The actor began with leading into what drove him to take a DNA test to trace his ancestry, “African-Americans, we’ve been severed from our past, we’ve been severed from the continent (Africa) in a way we’re reaching for a connection to it.”

Charlamagne and Boseman began conversing about the DNA tests they took to track their roots back to the homeland. The moment Charlamagne mentions he’s 97% West African, Boseman stops the host mid-sentence and rectifies him.

“Naw see that’s the wrong test”, the award-winning actor said wittingly. “You took Ancestry.Com, I took African Ancestry.”

The “Breakfast Club” host looked puzzled and wanted to know the difference between the two DNA tests, so Boseman broke it down in depth for Charlamagne.

“African Ancestry can tell you the specific group ethnic group you come from”, he explained to the radio personality. “If you know you’re Ebira from Nigeria now you can pinpoint specific customs and rituals that are apart of your past.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top