Mathew Knowles Says Beyoncé’s Success Is Due to Her Lighter Skin, Utah Congresswoman Fires Back

 

Would Beyoncé still be as huge of a star if her skin were darker? Mathew Knowles doesn’t think so, but a history-making Utah congresswoman disagrees.

“Well, I think Beyoncé is talented enough that she would have made her print on the world anyway,” Rep. Mia Love, Utah’s first Black congresswoman, tells TMZ Monday, Feb. 5. “I think she’s just [so] talented that the world would watch. It’s more than just about her color.”

Knowles made headlines for his take on how colorism has affected his dating life (he initially thought ex-wife Tina Lawson was white) and he thinks it’s also affected the singers who achieve mainstream success.

“When it comes to Black females, who are the people who get their music played on pop radio?” he asked in a Friday, Feb. 2 Ebony magazine profile. “Mariah Carey, Rihanna, the female rapper Nicki Minaj, my kids, and what do they all have in common?”

When the interviewer acknowledged the performers’ lighter skin, Knowles responded, “Do you think that’s an accident?”

“Of course not,” the reporter said.

“So you get it!”

Still, Love thinks enough progress has been made in the music industry so that a dark-skinned Beyoncé could thrive.

“I think that there are some really talented people out there that are doing their thing,” she says. “We need to continue to break the glass ceilings and allow people from all walks of life, all beliefs to do their thing and leave their imprint on the world.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top