NFL Speaks On That Jay-Z Super Bowl Rumor

Jay-Z Super Bowl

Jay Z dedicated a song to free agent quarterback Colin Kaepernick at a New York concert. (Zachary Mazur/FilmMagic)

A firm answer on whether or not Jay-Z will be performing his biggest hits during the Super Bowl halftime show next year isn’t in the cards. The NFL, which is usually mum on who will take the stage during football’s biggest night, shot down reports that Jay declined the invite.

“No decisions have been made on the performer(s) and we are not going to speculate on particular artists,” the league told Complex in a Wednesday, Sept. 20 statement. “Along with Pepsi, we know that we will put on a spectacular show. When it is time to announce her name we will do it. Or his name. Or their names.”

A source close to Jay told The Sun that it’s “simply not the case” that he’ll follow in the footsteps of wife Beyoncé by performing at the Super Bowl.

“He has enough songs to create an incredible performance but he really has no plans to do the halftime show,” said an insider.

The Source magazine speculated his decision could be in support of Colin Kaepernick and Ezekiel Elliot, the former of whom took a knee last season to protest Black oppression. Jay dedicated a song to the free agent quarterback at a recent New York City concert.


More Super Bowl News

‘This Is How I Felt on Election Night:’ Celebs Stunned at Falcons’ Epic Super Bowl Loss

Fox News Guest Sheriff Clarke Falsely Compares Beyoncé’s Super Bowl Ode to the Black Panthers to the KKK

Beyoncé Breaks Internet with New Video ‘Formation’, Super Bowl Performance, Tour Announcement


If the “Moonlight” rapper really isn’t a contender for the 2018 show, it’s not like he’d be missing out on any money. Pepsi executive Justin Toman told Variety “no money is exchanged.” Instead, “finding the mutual, shared win is the goal.”

No payment is one of the reasons why singer Kelly Clarkson, who is gearing up to release a new album in November, would never perform at one.

“No, you have to pay to do it! I’m not paying, you pay me,” she told “The Kane Show” Thursday, Sept. 14. “I heard that and I’m like, ‘Wait … I’ve been doing this too long y’all. I ain’t paying people.'”

The pay-to-play setup doesn’t seem to exist anymore, according to Forbes. But if a lack of mula hasn’t stopped Queen Bey from performing, why should it stop anyone else?

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top