People Aren’t Here for Writer’s Accusation That Bruno Mars Is Appropriating Black Culture

Writer Jenn M. Jackson stirred controversy among Black Twitter users when she proclaimed Black people should stop praising Bruno Mars and “be more critical about the ways we understand appropriation.”

Jackson, who also is a doctoral student at the University of Chicago, went on a Twitter spree before Mars’ opening performance at the BET Awards Sunday, June 25.

Jackson acknowledged that Mars credits funk artists occasionally but says the claims that he is responsible for the genre’s resurgence is appropriation.

She said she hopes acts like Chaka Khan and George Clinton get money from Mars “giving them credit” before delving into Mars’ past influences.

Jackson concluded that other artists like Tank and Anderson .Paak were better defined as funk acts over Mars and highlighted his opening performance at a Black music awards show.

The lengthy thread spurred many to voice dissent about Jackson’s argument.

Many proclaimed they’ll continue to support Mars.

And several didn’t tolerate the diss.

https://twitter.com/beingjaytee/status/879118777610371072

https://twitter.com/cametogiveiove/status/879026325075271680

However, not everyone disagreed with Jackson.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top