Jason Whitlock and Shannon Sharpe Have Vastly Different Reactions to LeBron’s Home Vandalism

Ask Jason Whitlock and Shannon Sharpe for their take on LeBron James’ statement about being Black and wealthy and you’ll get two drastically different responses.

On the eve of the Cleveland Cavaliers’ 113-91 loss to the Golden State Warriors Thursday night, James addressed the N-word scrawled on his Los Angeles home.

“No matter how much money you have, no matter how famous you are, no matter how many people admire you, being Black in America is — it’s tough,” James tells reporters Wednesday, May 31. “And we got a long way to go for us as a society and for us as African-Americans until we feel equal in America.”

Whitlock staunchly disagreed, slamming the Cavs star for supposedly playing the victim and writing the situation off as an “inconvenience.”

“Racism is an issue in America, but it’s primarily an issue for the poor. It’s not LeBron James’ issue,” Whitlock says Thursday on “The Herd With Colin Cowherd.” “He has removed himself from the damages and the ravages of real racism.”

The former sports journalist called James’ statement about it being tough to be Black “a lie,” and outlined his own privileged lifestyle before noting “I’m not nearly as rich as LeBron James” to support his idea.

However, Sharpe had a completely different take.

Like Whitlock, Sharpe also has wealth, but he believes that doesn’t save him from enduring racism.

“The hardest job in America is being Black because it’s the one thing you can’t outrun,” Sharpe says on “Undisputed” Thursday. “I was born dirt poor, but I rose through the ranks because God gave me a talent, I cultivated it … I got an education. But guess what I still was? I’m wealthy, I’m well-off, I’m financially secure, I’m educated, but I’m still Black. And that’s how they see [you].”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top