This ESPN Guest Is Not Impressed With Michael Jordan’s Newfound Altruism, Shares Another Way to Allocate Funds

On Monday’s edition of ESPN’s “Around the Horn,” sports journalist and educator Kevin Blackistone calls out Michael Jordan for his $2 million donation to the NAACP and a national police organization to stop violence in Black communities.

Atlanta Black Star reported yesterday that the NBA Hall of Famer is donating $1 million each to the International Association of Chief of Police’s newly established Institute for Community-Police Relations  and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund as a response to recent incidents of police brutality.

In the clip, Blackistone minces no words and says that Jordan’s donations would not help as much as he thinks.

“I’m hard-pressed to believe that you are emotionally moved by the extra-judicial killing of Black men in this country and then cut a check to the police,” Blackistone concludes. “The police are not in need of funding … The city of Baltimore has paid out nearly $12 million in settlements for police brutality lawsuits between 2010-14 …”

Blackistone also says that money could be better put to use by the Black Lives Matter movement to create a legal arm.

The commentator points out that Jordan has real influence and can change things if he wants to.

According to Blackistone, the NBA great should convince Hanes underwear company to reopen factories in urban areas that prevent the next Eric Garner from selling loose cigarettes in the first place.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top