Model Behavior? RHOA Cynthia Bailey Accused of Online Scam

Cynthia Bailey runs modeling contest scam

Source: HelloBeautiful.com

The “Real Housewives of Atlanta” has another cast member at the center of fraud accusations.

This time, Cynthia Bailey is being accused of scamming through an online modeling contest that wasn’t living up to its promises.

The contest allows parents to submit photos of their children in an online modeling contest for a fee of $20 per submission. Each month Cynthia’s modeling agency is supposed to publish the photos of the winners on the website, but that isn’t exactly how things worked for several months.

The website had not published a new photo of any contest winners since October of 2013. The real problem, however, is that the website was still collecting the $20 submission fees from parents.

CBS Atlanta took a closer look at the alleged scam and discovered that over $1,500 has been collected from participants without any winner ever being selected.

“It’s just not right to be advertising that you’re going to do one thing and take people’s money from around the country and you’re not following through on what you’re saying,” said Dorothy Lewis, an Atlanta mother who paid to enter her child in the contest. “It’s like false advertisement.”

It is unclear what the collected money has been used for, but there is speculation that it isn’t being used the way the contest participants believed it would be.

Initially, the money was said to be going to the Atlanta Diaper Relief which is a nonprofit organization that actually closed down several months ago.

Cynthia Bailey kids modeling contest The website has since been updated to list Tameka Raymond’s charity “Kile’s World” as the new recipient of the money earned from the contest.

Bailey also released a statement recently where she apologized for her negligence and assured her fans that her efforts are still sincere.

“I apologize for any negligence on my part as far as my staff not keeping the website properly updated,” she said. “I hope after receiving all the correct and updated information from me personally, you can appreciate the sincerity of my intentions. I appreciate you for bringing this important matter to my attention.”

The website now features a list of all the winners since January 2013.

Meanwhile, Cynthia slammed the angry contest participants for being “negative” by accusing her agency of ripping them off.

“First of all I think that’s a very negative approach to the whole situation,” she said. “That’s not like their $20 wasn’t being used for what it was intended for. It’s just a matter of us being in transition on our side and we were just behind on the website.”

Of course, if that was the case, it may have done Cynthia well to put the contest on hold until the website was back up and running.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top