Paul George Boosts Pacers Over Celtics

paul-george-pacers

The Boston Celtics didn’t show up in the second half of the game against the Indiana Pacers Friday night.

The Pacers went into the locker room at halftime down by eight points but surged back for a 97-82 victory to improve on their best record in the Eastern Conference.

Boston had 16 turnovers in the second half, which turned into 23 points for Indiana.

“Our starters, as a unit, have a gear defensively that they can reach that’s pretty special,” Pacers coach Frank Vogel said. “They hit that in the third and took control of the game.”

The Pacers put a clamp on Jordan Crawford after he made all eight of his field goal attempts and scored 19 points in the first. He finished the game with 24.

“I think probably I was lackadaisical,” Crawford said, “disappointed in myself, didn’t complete the game.”

Crawford committed six of Boston’s turnovers and also shot a lower field goal percentage in the second half.

“We passed the ball too much,” Celtics coach Brad Stevens said. “That probably had a lot to do with our shot selection.”

Paul George led the Pacers with 27 points, 22 of which came in the second half.

“Whatever the circumstance is in the first half,” George said, halftime “is the time for us to re-evaluate what’s going on.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top