Robin Thicke Claims ‘Blurred Lines’ is About Wife Paula Patton

Weeks after Robin Thicke was criticized for his “Blurred Lines” song, he has offered a new explanation for the lyrics, explaining that the summer jam is about his sexy wife – not rape, as many critics suggested.

Quite frankly, this may very well be a case of too little, too late.

Robin’s “Blurred Lines” controversy had been dying down lately, and the debate over what the lyrics meant against the backdrop of scantily clad girls in his music video never really impacted its popularity.

What did impact Robin’s reputation with fans was his performance of  the song with singer Miley Cyrus at the August MTV Video Music Awards.  The Daily Beast’s Tricia Romano described the song as being “rapey,” when it was first released, so performing it with the young starlet twerking in a nude bikini certainly didn’t help Thicke’s case.

Anyway, it seems like one of his publicists finally found a way to explain the lyrics as not being “rapey,” and apparently it took quite a bit of time to come up with something.

“I don’t think people got it,” the soulful crooner told BBC’s Newsbeat. “I wrote it about my wife… she’s my good girl and I know she wants it because we’ve been together for 20 years.”

The lackluster explanation probably won’t be enough to change the minds of many of the song’s critics especially since their concerns also involved the nude models who filled the music video.

Either way, one person who definitely doesn’t mind the song and doesn’t care about any explanations is his wife Paula Patton.

Even after watching her man grind all over a girl who isn’t even old enough to legally buy alcohol, Patton is sticking by her man’s side, supporting the song and even bragging about her man in the sheets.

In addition to the sexually charged lyrics and naked models, another controversial part of the music video was a message formed with large balloons that read, “Robin Thicke as a big d**k.”

Well if you weren’t upset that he put the message there in the first place, you were probably one of the fans who was wondering if the message was true or not. According to Patton , it certainly isn’t a lie.

“Robin’s like, ‘Listen, if I’m, you know, in the Miami Heat’s locker room, I don’t know where I stand,’ ” Thicke’s wife said with a laugh. “But I think that the statement is fairly accurate.”

Note the use of the word “fairly,” however. Perhaps Thicke shouldn’t brag about his anatomy in his music videos if his balloon message was only “fairly accurate.”

As for how Paula feels about the song supposedly being about her, she’s fine with it and just hopes that she still has a good girl deep down inside somewhere.

“Gosh, I hope I’m still a good girl and bad girl at the same time, and I think that every girl should know the bad girl inside her – and that doesn’t make her bad, you know,” Paula continued.

So there you have it. Thicke has found his story and he’s sticking to it – not that it matters. Everyone has moved on past the “rapey” lyrics controversy and are now much more upset with Thicke for filing a lawsuit against Marvin Gaye’s family over copyright issues and making claims that Justin Timberlake ripped off his style.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top