Ashton Kutcher Discusses Portraying Complex Tech Legend in Film ‘Jobs’

 

Ashton Kutcher undertook one of his most challenging roles as an actor in his portrayal of technology legend and Apple Inc., co-founder Steve Jobs in the new movie “Jobs,” which is due out on Aug. 16.

It may seem a little too soon for someone to make a movie about Jobs, who died less than two years ago. However, he is such a legendary figure that the story is compelling enough to draw people in.

According to techcrunch.com:

“Ashton Kutcher, who took on the role of Jobs and even ended up in the hospital along the way, sat down with TechCrunch alongside co-star Josh Gad (who plays Steve Wozniak) to discuss the biopic.

‘”We’re taking on two people who are enormously important, who are still a part of the cultural zeitgeist, one of whom is still living and breathing,’ said Gad. ‘So we didn’t take that lightly.’

“For Kutcher, however, his biggest challenge was pleasing both groups of people who knew and interacted with Jobs: the group that loved him and the group that didn’t like him so much.

“‘He was a polarizing character,’ said Kutcher. ‘He had a 95 percent approval rating from his employees, but he would berate somebody for doing something wrong. I wanted to tell that story honestly in a way that both sides said, ‘Yeah, that was Steve.’”

Although I think the timing of this story is wrong, this has been the recent trend in Hollywood. Just as last year’s “Zero Dark Thirty,” about the execution of Osama Bin Laden, also felt too soon.

But because of the legend that is Steve Jobs and the popularity Apple, the company that carries his legacy, people are going to flock to theaters to check to Ashton’s portrayal. Let’s hope it is one that lives up to the legend.

Check out the video and tell us what you think.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top