Jamie Foxx Full-Frontal Thrusts 'Django Unchained' Into Lock Down In China

There was just too much Jamie Foxx in Django Unchained for China.

Authorities have reportedly shut down screenings of Quentin Tarantino’s bloody spaghetti western one minute into its debut, even after a major marketing campaign and several edits by the filmmakers to tone down the bloodshed.

“‘Django’ screenings have been postponed and we can’t guarantee when they will be resumed,” said a spokesperson for Beijing’s Sanlitun Megabox theater.

This would have been Tarantino’s first film to be released in China. Cultural authorities restrict the number of foreign films in theaters each year, but claimed the movie had been postponed for “technical reasons.”

However, many are speculating that a torture scene in which Jamie Foxx goes full-frontal nude may have set off the censorship alarm.

But prominent film critic, Wei Xidi, told the New York Times it’s unlikely that was the reason because a scene like that would never make it past the brutal censorship process

“This film, like all Chinese films, has gone through a censorship process and has been edited for a Chinese audience,” said Xidi. “Because it has gone through this process, it doesn’t make sense that it would be halted all of a sudden on the night of its premiere.”

The real reason Django Unchained was pulled may never be known, but this film is one the Chinese people shouldn’t miss out on, so hopefully Sony Pictures and Tarantino can work things out with the Chinese government.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top