Evelyn Lozada Strips for PETA

Evelyn Lozada is the latest celebrity to strip for PETA’s “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” campaign.

Today, the Basketball Wives star, 37, unveiled her campaign, which is winter-themed for the holidays.  In the ads, Lozada is sprawled naked in the snow, notably without any kind of coat. The ad’s release is strategically timed as shoppers head to the mall for holiday gifts.

At the ad’s big reveal, Lozada admitted she used to be a fur fan, “I was very much into fur so for me to not wear it, I just feel like I am a voice for the animals and if I change one person’s mind on wearing fur, then I feel like I have done something.”

A video showing animal slaughter changed Lozada’s mind: “You can verbalize what happens to these animals a thousand times, but when you see it, it definitely clicks in—and it did for me,” she said. At the press conference for the ad, Lozada urged other fur lovers to do similar research, to at least get educated so they can make an informed decision.

“I couldn’t see the whole video because it was very, very sad,” said Lozada.

Lozada’s PETA  campaign follows one featuring Wendy Williams, who also stripped for “Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur.” “We should all try to be comfortable in our own skin and let the animals keep theirs,”  said Williams. “I don’t really think that fur is the mark of success anymore. As a decent person, with compassion, it just seems like the right thing to support.”

Lozada and Williams follow a long line of stars, including Khloe Kardashian, who have given their support to the brand for animal rights.  Lozada and Williams add diversity to the string of women featured in the ads, something PETA appears to be wisely focusing on to reiterate that animal protection is an issue for everyone to take seriously.

Read the rest of this story on Popular Critic

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top