Would Quentin Tarantino's Original Leads For 'Django Unchained' Been A Better Choice Than Jamie Foxx?

In a recent interview with Playboy, Quentin Tarantino talked extensively about his upcoming film Django Unchained, where he went into particulars about his first choice for casting the lead for the project. The director mentioned various big stars, which may or may not have been a good choice for the part. Even though the film hasn’t come out yet, there are several trailers circling around the internet which displays Jamie Foxx in the lead role in the film. In comparing Foxx to Tarantino’s first choices, one could actually pick their favorite by using the histories of the other actors. So, did Tarantino make the best casting choice in picking Foxx to play Django?

First, Will Smith was Tarantino’s first choice for the part of Django.

“We spent quite a few hours together over a weekend when he was in New York doing Men in Black III,” says Tarantino about Will Smith. “I think half the process was an excuse for us to hang out and spend time with one another. It just wasn’t 100 per cent right, and we didn’t have time to try to make it that way.”

After the director realized that the role wasn’t a perfect fit for Will Smith, he met several others before seeking Foxx.

“I met six different actors and had extensive meetings with all of them, and I went in-depth on all of their work. Idris Elba, Chris Tucker, Terrence Howard, M.K. Williams Tyrese. They all appreciated the material, and I was going to put them through the paces, make them go off against one another and kind of put up an obstacle course.”

Foxx was Tarantino’s sixth choice for the lead, but he claims that he was convinced after meeting with the actor.

“And then I met Jamie. He was the cowboy… Forget the fact that he has his own horse – and that is actually his horse in the movie. He’s from Texas; he understands. …He understood what it’s like to be thought of as an ‘other.’”

So, do you agree with Tarantino, or do you believe that one of the other five actors could have been better to play Django.

Django Unchained hits theaters Christmas day.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top