Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Entertainment
EntertainmentHer Side

Azaelia Banks Boycotts Dolce & Gabanna for Racist Imagery

Posted byBy Kevin Webb | Published on: | Updated on October 24, 2012 CommentsComments (0)

Artist Azealia Banks will be staging a boycott of Italian designer Dolce & Gabanna, harshly criticizing the spring 2013 collection the company debuted last month. Present in the collection are caricatures of women of color, printed on dresses and made into earrings. Dolce & Gabbana chose to send out only white models during their showcase, drawing criticism from a number of sources. Banks may be the loudest voice yet, as she laid into the designer on Friday via Twitter.

“Definitely boycotting Dolce & Gabanna,” the rising star tweeted. “Whoever designed that racist ass Dolce and Gabanna collection needs a swift kick in the mouth and a big d–k up the ass.”

“I really hate when people do corny, racist things then try to justify it as ‘art,’” She added.

When the bad press first hit, Dolce & Gabanna posted an article to their website Swide.com, describing the pieces as “blackamoors,” and attempting to justify their cultural significance to the designer’s Sicily theme.

“The head is inspired by Moorish features. Moorish is a term used to define many peoples throughout history,” the article explained. “In Sicily’s case it defines the conquerors of Sicily. The first Muslim conquest of southern Italy lasted 75 years, from 827 to 902 AD.”

Regardless of its historical significance, the images did evoke feelings of racism when used in a contemporary setting.

“It’s all just really unnecessary,” Banks told her fans. “The clothes in the collection were fine without all the “black mammie” imagery.

 

 

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top