Lance Armstrong Leaves Livestrong AND Nike

Things aren’t looking too hot for the world’s most well known cyclist, Lance Armstrong.

While Armstrong isn’t directly a Hollywood actor, he’s been mingling with the A-list ElIn an article released by The Hollywood Reporter, Armstrong was recently fired from his contract with Nike. The coveted sports brand stated “due to the seemingly insurmountable evidence that Lance Armstrong participated in doping and misled Nike for more than a decade, it is with great sadness that we have terminated our contract with him.” This is coming on the heels of Armstrong’s recent announcement he would no longer fight the U.S. Anti Doping Agency’s crusade against him. He wasn’t directly admitting he was doping, but the fact he didn’t fight the stripping of his titles and banning from racing ever again is a little suspicious to me. Don’t worry about Armstrong’s financial situation though, he was able to earn 17.5 million from Nike in 2005. Well that is unless he’s spent it all on lawyers and covering up his doping, but who really knows?

The cyclist also ‘voluntarily’ stepped down as chairman of the Lance Armstrong Foundation, an organization he founded in 1996 to raise money for cancer research. As seen in the LA Times, Armstrong explains “to spare the foundation any negative effects as a result of controversy surrounding my cycling career, I will conclude my chairmanship” and named Vice-Chairman Jeff Garvey as his replacement.

While Armstrong, his doctors, and his lawyer continue to deny, deny, deny it seems like the people have given up on the once lauded championship cyclist. There is simply too much evidence mounting against Armstrong for the public to turn a blind eye.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top