O.J. Simpson and Khloe K: Is this Kardashian a Simpson?

The debate over O.J Simpson and Khloe Kardashian being related has reached a new boiling point as reports have revealed that Simpson has added Khloe K. to his will.

Earlier this year, rumors sparked over if Khloe was the biological daughter of the former NFL star after he claimed to have had an affair with the Kardashian’s mother, Kris Jenner.

The once completely unreliable rumor is starting to get a little more backing now that the acquitted murder defendant has added Khloe to his will.

“O.J believes Khloe is his natural-born daughter through his affair with Kris Jenner when she was married to his buddy Robert Kardashian – and he wants to do something about it,” an anonymous source told The National Enquirer.

Previously, the only “evidence” behind the rumor was the fact that O.J Simpson and Khloe K. certainly looked like they could be related. More recently, side by side photos comparing the youngest Kardashian sister to Simpson’s daughter Sydney revealed that the two look strikingly similar.

To make matters even more interesting, Simpson has also just removed his older daughter, 43-year-old Arnelle Simpson, from his will.

“He blames Arnelle for not paying the mortgage and blowing the bulk of his monthly NFL pension checks on lavish living,” the source added.

Of course, The National Enquirer isn’t exactly the most credible source, and since no other major media source has reported Khloe’s addition to Simpson’s will, this story certainly isn’t written in stone.

Jenner has spent countless days denying the rumor and has even urged her daughter to take a DNA test just to put a stop to what she believes to be a “ridiculous” story.

 

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top