Former Financial Advisor to Scottie Pippen Now Facing Federal Charges

A Chicago-based investment advisor who once represented six-time NBA champion Scottie Pippen was indicted on federal charges, accused of defrauding two of his clients as well as a suburban bank out of more than $3.2 million, the Chicago Tribune reports.

Wednesday a federal grand jury indicted Robert Lunn, 62, with 5 counts of bank fraud. Each bank fraud count carried a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison, a $1 million fine, and mandatory restitution. According to prosecutors, the bank lost more than $2.7 million as a result of Lunn’s actions and looks to recover at least that amount.

According to the indictment, Lunn allegedly misrepresented the purpose of the loans as well as the nature of his investment portfolio to Oak Brook-based Leaders Bank. Lunn is accused of using the money for his own benefit, making mortgage payments and paying off other investment clients.

This isn’t Lunn’s first run in with the law; in 2004 he lost an $11.8 million dollar judgment to Pippen after the NBA legend accused him of steering his money into dubious investments, including real estate and an airplane deal.

Neither Lunn nor Leaders Bank have issued a statement.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top