Charlotte Woman Unloads On Fox News Reporter Asking Why She’s Out Protesting

On Sept. 21, a Charlotte, North Carolina protester confronts a FOX News reporter for his response to a shooting during the protest.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police shot 43-year-old Keith Scott Tuesday after claiming the man posed an imminent threat to them.

However, a witness says Scott was unarmed and complied with officers.

Since the shooting, protesters have stormed the streets looking for justice.

In the clip, the woman overhears reporter Steve Harrigan talk about a shooting that occurred at last night’s protest.

She interjects, and begins to spar with the reporter.

Harrigan asks the protester why she was at the protest, implying that she really does not care because someone was recently shot.

“If a man was shot about 50 yards over there, and we don’t know by who, why are you here?”

“Why am I here? Because I serve a purpose, sir. Because my father serves a purpose, my brother serves a purpose … OK, you said a man got shot over here, right? So you basically said why would I put myself in danger? Because I could be at work, in school, in my car — I could still get shot by the police! … You wanna make a f—- fabricated story.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top