Trump Won’t Let Go of His Reflecting Pool Rant as He Refuses to Face the Truth — Then His Boast About What’s Ahead Backfires

Donald Trump had every chance to tell the truth.

Instead, he stood at a podium on Friday, Oct. 9, and reached for a story that even his own Justice Department has already abandoned in court.

He needed less than 20 seconds to come clean. But he couldn’t settle on what to share, and his progress report doesn’t match what’s actually happening on the National Mall right now.

Trump attacks reporters
Donald Trump claimed on Oct. 9 that vandals “viciously attacked” the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, even though his own Justice Department blamed the damage on the contractor. (Photo by Nathan Howard/Getty Images)

It’s the latest twist in the never-ending saga of his Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool makeover, a project that has turned into one of the most embarrassing fumbles of his second term.

The pool has sat behind a fence for months, and Trump still won’t say aloud what his administration already admitted.

‘This Is Not Good’: Trump Erupts After Brutal Close-Up Forces Him to Confront the Truth About What People Have Been Saying for Months

‘Did His Pool Man Do the Work?’: Trump Brags About White House Upgrade—Then Critics Look Down, Spot a Detail That Could Send Visitors to the Hospital

But Trump won’t let go, refusing to face the truth as his boast about what’s ahead backfires.

“They viciously attacked the reflecting pool. Cutting it with probably box knives. Knives or box knives. Uh, boxcutters and uh, it’s almost fixed now and finished,” Trump told the press in an X post shared.

Neither part of that statement holds up.

Trump announced the renovation in the spring, promising to coat the bottom of the century-old pool in what he called “American flag blue” in time for America’s 250th birthday on July 4.

He pitched it as a fast, cheap fix that would cost less than $2 million, according to Mediaite.

The bill told a different story.

Virginia-based Atlantic Industrial Coatings landed the job without a competitive bid. ABC News reported that the company received more than $14.6 million for the project.

Days after the pool reopened in June, algae turned the water green and pieces of the new blue coating started peeling off the bottom.

Rather than blame the job, Trump blamed vandals. He claimed someone sliced a 300-foot gash into the lining with “probably a box cutter.” But a month earlier, he bragged that the “very strong” new coating would “last for at least 50 years.”

Arrests followed. The most high-profile involved 67-year-old three-time Olympic canoeist David Hearn, who faced a charge for felony destruction of property.

The case against him, which began when he stopped during a bike ride to look at a piece of peeling coating, fell apart.

Prosecutors built a case against Hearn after he stopped during a bike ride to inspect peeling coating. It fell apart in court.

The Justice Department moved to drop the charge after reviewing the documents. They blamed the damage on flawed installation by the contractor. The documents cited repeated lining failures during installation and a rush to finish before the Fourth of July.

As for “almost fixed now and finished,” the National Park Service has the pool, its walkways and the surrounding grass closed until at least Oct. 20, citing ongoing repairs that involve heavy equipment.

Social media users didn’t let any of it slide.

“That’s a lie. And it’s not almost finished.. so that’s another lie,” one person wrote on X.

Another user pointed out what they felt got lost in the noise. They wrote, “America moved on way too quickly from the President trying to send an Olympian to prison as a way to cover up the fact that the contractors he hired did such a terrible job that it immediately began falling apart.”

On Threads, someone had a pointed question for the press corps: “The immediate follow up question should be- so when will someone be charged in court? Why did the last case get thrown out?”

“Someday people will tell him he’s lying to his face, but today is not that day,” a fourth person added.

And one skeptic simply started a timer, writing, “Two weeks. Start the countdown. I bet it won’t even be done by Thanksgiving.”

Trump hasn’t always stuck to this script. 

Back in August, his reflecting pool story imploded after he forgot his own script and threw his handpicked contractors under the bus.

Days later, he admitted on Truth Social that there was “some contractor error” from rushing the job. He even conceded there was “no video or proof” of the other damage he’d pinned on vandals.

Weeks later, a Trump ally kept pushing his version of the truth anyway, even as critics pointed to the paper trail.

The legal fallout has only grown since. A judge slammed the door on the Hearn case for good on Oct. 1, permanently barring prosecutors from reviving it after the White House pushed for a do-over.

Now, Hearn is fighting back. The former Olympian wants an apology from Trump, and his legal team says nothing is off the table.

Meanwhile, Trump keeps telling the same story to anyone who will listen. The only thing that changes is the weapon.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top