‘Blow It!’: Black YouTuber Fires After Being Threatened by White Man, Cops Show Up Moments Later and Shoot Him 9 Times—Yet He’s the One Facing Charges

There are new developments in the case of a non-fatal shooting in downtown Denver that are causing racial tensions to simmer online.

Video surfaced showing that the white victim first chased and goaded the Black man to open fire before police shot him nine times and arrested him.

The confrontation between Luis Johnson, 24, an activist known for documenting alleged police misconduct, and an unidentified white male, 27, occurred just before 2 a.m. on May 3.

A Black Youtuber shot a man taunting him and then was shot by police moments later (Photo: X/ @vaelor0)

A video purportedly taken by the white man captured the moments before Johnson discharged his semi-automatic pistol.

At one point, after the man called him the n-word and smashed a bottle at his feet, Johnson told him, “Just go, bro,” and ran across the street.

“I got your face [on camera], you’re gonna do life, n-word,” the man said as he followed Johnson. He then screamed for Johnson to shoot him, “You’re a b-tch. Blow it! Blow it.”

‘We Want to Do What We Can Now’: Quakers Quietly Bankroll Black Homeownership in Pennsylvania, While Congress Lets Reparations Rot

Johnson shot the man once after attempting to de-escalate the situation and backing away.

Responding to the subsequent 911 call, officers Conor Miller and Andrew Ulum were in a police vehicle when a man stopped them as they approached the scene.

“He shot my son,” the man said, pointing to Johnson, who was running toward his apartment building, the gun still in his hand.

The officers intercepted Johnson in the building’s lobby area and opened fire, never issuing a verbal warning. Police rushed him to the hospital with serious injuries before arresting him on an attempted murder charge, though the charge’s current status remains unclear. The unidentified man also went to the hospital and survived.

On July 2, Denver District Attorney John Walsh stated that the officers would not face disciplinary action or criminal charges, as an investigation concluded their actions were “reasonable and justified.”

The statement shared by local news outlet Fox 31 (KDVR) read in part: “When Johnson turned toward them and brought his gun around to his left, the threat they reasonably perceived from him was immediate and deadly. The risk was too grave and too fast moving for them to pause before defending themselves to issue a warning.”

Johnson runs The Real Constitutional Upholders, a YouTube channel with more than 16,000 subscribers where he documents what he describes as police wrongdoing, with videos dating back to 2020.

He has accused police of harassing him on multiple occasions, telling the Englewood City Council in March 2025 that officers filed “multiple retaliatory charges” against him for open carrying and that he had filed complaints alleging police misconduct. He said this pattern of harassment is what led him to start posting the videos.

The DA’s finding addressed only whether the officers acted lawfully when they shot Johnson, not whether Johnson committed the offense that led to his arrest. But the footage has shed new light on what led up to the shooting, and many online now argue Johnson acted in self-defense.

“If he shot him in the first 15 seconds of the video it would be different—he literally ran away, and the guy followed him, then pressed him, actively telling him to shoot,” a top comment on X read.

Another user wrote, “I’ve never seen someone try to spare somebody like this.”

Others pushed back. “The person with the camera is clearly an idiot,” one reply read. “But Americans are so cavalier with the prospect of taking a life. In no way was this interaction, despite the level of confrontation, justification…”

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top