‘You Hit Me In the Face’: Black Man’s Meta Glasses Captures Argument at Laundromat That May Have Just Saved Him from Jail

A dispute over dry cleaning and spray bottles at an Auburn, Maine, laundromat ended with police called on a Black man doing his laundry.

One person’s mundane chore of washing several loads of clothes went viral after he stealthily captured an explosive exchange with a white employee on his Meta glasses.

An argument broke out when the laundromat employee began spraying and wiping down the washers where the man, who goes by shizzyshaxk online, was doing his laundry.

TikTok user captures confrontation with laundromat employee on his Meta glasses. (Credit: shizzyshaxk/TikTok)

The location also offers dry-cleaning services, and shizzyshaxk claimed the woman had ruined his dry-cleaning in the past by spraying it with a chemical solution. Apparently, there was too much cleaning going on at the cleaners.

“When I’m here, you’re always doing this stuff with the spray. You sprayed a thousand dollars worth of dry cleaning with that same stuff,” he told her.

‘Snoring on the Floor’: D.C. Passenger Takes a Swing At Black Driver, Then Quickly Learns the Definition of a Knock-out Punch

He said this one video was just the tip of the iceberg. “You know my clothes. I’ve been here for years. You do that on purpose. Can you stop doing stuff to antagonize me, please?” He added, “You’re a weird-ass lady.”

Fed up, he moved to block the woman from spraying inside his washer’s soap dispenser. It’s unclear from the video if his arm accidentally made contact with her face, but the move prompted her to cry out, “You hit me in the face! Get the f*ck off me.”

A second employee jumped into the fray. One of the women called the cops, who issued a “no trespass” citation. The cleaners also banned him for life. But that’s chump change compared to what could have happened. As he wrote in the caption: “Would have been in jail if it wasn’t for these Meta glasses.”

Viewers of the video on social media weren’t united in their opinions. On Atlanta Black Star’s official Instagram, one person argued he was “emotional and confrontational for no reason.”

The commenter added: “As a man, cite the problem, give a solution, and move on. The back-and-forth discord is pointless and foolish.” Many urged him to get his own washer and dryer, and “stop giving them your money if you’re being disrespected!”

But several others found the employee’s actions even more troubling, believing she was intentionally targeting him. At least one internet sleuth caught her in a lie: “She said she didn’t know him, then brought up his GF at the end.”

Echoing dozens of comments, one supporter wrote, “He is a customer. If he doesn’t want her doing that, let him finish and then spray the machine.”

With 1.5 million views and counting, it’s safe to say the dirty laundry in this situation has officially been aired.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top