‘He Finally Went Low’: Obama Stops Playing Nice, Publicly Humiliates Trump Over Iran Disaster and Exposes the One Petty Obsession That Keeps Him Spiraling

Former President Barack Obama took the gloves off, finally firing back at President Donald Trump over both Trump’s decision to pull out of a nuclear agreement with Iran during his first term and for taking the U.S. into a chaotic and unapproved war against the Islamic Republic over the very thing the original agreement accomplished.

In a May 5 interview with late night TV host Stephen Colbert that aired on Wednesday, May 13, on “The Late Show,” which is ending it’s long run next week, the popular former president threw some very subtle shade at Trump questioning his decision to scrap the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran that Obama helped negotiate “without firing a missile,” and a not so subtle jab there at Trump’s ongoing war against Iran.

Author Michael Wolff reveals Donald Trump lied about racist ape video featuring the Obamas. Photo credit: Scott Olson / Getty Images; Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Obama Rarely Criticizes Trump Publicly


It’s extremely rare, for Obama the first Black president of the United States, to comment on or criticize Trump, who spent all of Obama’s two terms in office, spreading conspiracy theories and lies about him and former first lady Michelle Obama.

But the Democrat did “go low” as supporters cheered his decision to finally speak out. The “go low” reference harkens back to former first lady Michelle Obama’s famous speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2016 when she told voters, “When they go low, we go high” with supporters saying it’s high time Obama went low.

‘He Got Smacked Down!’: Trump’s Tough-Guy Act Evaporates Next to World Leader as He Panics Over Simple Question and Blurts Out Strange Compliments

“We went about trying to negotiate a diplomatic agreement that would get the enriched uranium out of Iran, that would assure that they could not get to a nuclear weapon without us knowing about it.” Obama explained.

“That it was internationally agreed upon and that there were mechanisms in place to enforce it and verify it, and we pulled it off without firing a missile. We got 97 percent of their enriched uranium out,” he continued before pointing out, “We didn’t have to kill a whole bunch of people or shut down the Strait of Hormuz.”

Obama Defends 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal

Thirty percent of the global oil supply passes through the Strait everyday or at least it did before Trump started what critics have called a visionless and dangerous war, lacking a clear strategic objective and coherent endgame.

Colbert pushed back on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, pointing out, “Now well there was some dispute that it didn’t work well.”

“They didn’t believe that it didn’t work. He just said it didn’t work,” Obama countered.

 “Worst, worst deal of all,” Colbert interjected.

 “Yeah, because I did it, which is fine, that seems to be a pattern,” Obama stated as Colbert chuckled.

“But there was no serious independent folks who would say that it didn’t work with respect to the nuclear program,” Obama continued, stating the facts.

“Now, if your agenda was to bring about regime change in Iran, well, that wasn’t the goal of the agreement,” he noted, which is one of the first reasons Trump gave for the surprise attack on Iran on Feb. 28, without congressional authorization or any help from U.S. allies, except for Israel.

In the first weeks after Trump launched his military campaign against Tehran, he never mentioned a nuclear goal, most likely because he spent most of last year bragging that he had wiped out the country’s nuclear capabilities during a 12-day military campaign last June, which turned out be false.

Obama made several more points about the 2015 agreement.

Karoline Leavitt’s Loyalty to Trump Just Came Back to Haunt Her at the Moment She Least Expected and There Was Nothing She Could Do to Stop the Public Humiliation

“If your goal was to dismantle the Iranian military so that it couldn’t cause any other problems in the region, then it didn’t do that. But that wasn’t the goal, right? So, part of this balance between military force and diplomacy is based on, what are your objectives? What are your goals?” he said.

Trump and Defense chief Pete Hegseth spent the first month of their war offering shifting messages and mixed objectives finally landing on dismantling Iran’s nuclear program as the main objective by late March.

Social Media Reacts to Obama’s Comments About Trump

Social media exploded in glee over Obama finally addressing what opponent’s call Trump’s lies about not only the war but about his hatred of Obama.

“Trump’s whole mission in life is to undo Obama’s legacy and failing miserably, the harder Trump tries, the more people love Obama,” a Threads user observed.

Others agreed, “Yea he can’t stand on going with what a black man achieved.”

This poster didn’t mince words.

“Trump hates Obama only reason you at war with iran. The plan was working and trump can’t have that. He needed to destroy it.”

Another chimed in, “Soooo True! Insecurity and known inferiority animate almost all Of this pumpkin POTUS’s actions.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top