‘Why Are You Running?’: Karen ‘Glitched Out’ Trying to Escape Camera After Berating Black Shopper in Viral Video

A white woman who made a rude comment to a Black shopper at a Boston sporting goods store learned a hard lesson that will stick.

After telling the fellow shopper — who goes by Lowtek on social media — that he looked unemployed, he pulled out his phone camera and sought payback.

 

Karen 'Glitched Out' Trying to Escape Camera After Berating Black Shopper In Viral Video
A woman tries to hide her face after a man attempts to film her harassing him. (Photos: l0wtek)

“Excuse me,” he said as he started filming, “you’re the one who said it looks like I need a job.”

The oblivious woman responded, “Yeah.” Then she noticed she was being filmed, and as one commenter put it, the realization must have “glitched her out.”

‘I Will Bury You!’: Detroit Hairstylist Accused of Pulling AR-Style Gun on Client Over $10 Dispute, Then Drops a Wild Claim About the Viral Story

Flipping from calm to chaos, the woman hilariously flailed among clothing racks, shrieked in the store aisles, and made a mad dash to avoid the camera, which was ultimately unsuccessful. The March 9 video has garnered more than 4 million views and thousands of comments in just 24 hours.

“Are you mentally ill or something? Why are you running from the camera?” Lowtek asked, somewhat facetiously. “You was just talking mad sh-t to me.”

“Ahhh, get away from me!” she screamed before ducking behind merchandise and then running toward Lowtek while wildly swinging at him.

He captioned the Instagram post, “I got attacked 🤣”

In the age of viral videos, it’s tough to hold people’s attention online, but ironically, her attempt to hide from the camera did just that. Instagram users are getting a good laugh out of the 10-second clip and flooding the comments section with light-hearted teasing about her reaction.

One wrote, “LMFAOOOOOO she did a sneak attack from behind the shorts I’m dead.” Another person chimed in, “She could have dipped behind the other rack instead; she chose to wrap herself in merchandise and attack you.”

“Get away from me as she RUNS towards you,” wrote another, followed by “LMFAOOO the way she was DUCKKINNN 😂😭😭”

But a few acknowledged the potential seriousness of the situation. As one put it, “Crazy to think only 100 years ago she could’ve gotten bro deleted with half a scream. Thank God it’s 2026 and not 1926.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top