Black History Month is closing out with President Donald Trump declaring DEI dead during the State of the Union address. More outrageous, his rhetoric around immigration and ICE during the speech left little doubt about how his administration feels about Black and Brown communities.
Then, many might remember how earlier in the month, the president posted a video portraying Barack and Michelle Obama as animals, prompting Democratic Texas Rep. Al Green to hold up a sign during the SOTU address that said, “Black People Are Not Apes.”
Karoline Leavitt’s face doesn’t match her feet in new photos circulating online. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
The 28-year-old press secretary showed up polished — black top and bottom, a white Peter Pan collar, powder-blue trench coat as she stood between Minnesota Wild defenseman Quinn Hughes and White House deputy director of communications Margo Martin. But the internet noticed something the stylist apparently missed. Her face and hands read noticeably tanned, while her ankles, peeking out just below the hemline, told a completely different story.
Threads users wasted no time weighing in. “Nearly spit out my oatmeal,” joked one person.
“Gotta take that Jergens natural glow all the way down down to your cankles,” one person wrote.
A third chimed in, “I thought self-tanner when pregnant was a no-no.”
“Looks like she’s been playing in daddy’s makeup drawer,” one commenter posted.
The moment reopened a familiar conversation about cosmetic presentation in this administration.
Donald Trump’s long-discussed bronzed complexion has been the subject of commentary for years. Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, speaking on the podcast “Advisory Opinions,” once recalled seeing Trump apply his own makeup on himself during campaign travel, confirming suspicions that the glow is deliberate.
When attention drifted away from tone, it settled on tailoring.
Leavitt may be the youngest person to hold the press secretary position, but critics frequently say her wardrobe leans decades older.
Another added, “Why doesn’t she have a stylist. Such frumpery.”
That scrutiny isn’t new. A pink tweed ensemble posted last summer on her Instagram triggered similar reactions. People called her frumpy and said that the outfit aged her significantly. In fact, they said she was wearing a “grandma outfit for her old man” in the photograph.
In the hockey photo, standing beside players close to her age, the structured collar and classic coat amplified what many view as a generational disconnect, even sharper.
By the time you read through the Threads, many commenters settled on a simple explanation: white nylon stockings. That would account for the sharp contrast from ankle to face.
But even if hosiery explains the optics, it doesn’t quite address the bigger question floating through the replies: why is this blonde-haired, blue-eyed white woman so tanned in this picture?
The internet may have solved Karoline Leavitt’s stocking mystery. The tan and her desire to have one, however, are still up for debate.
Democracy needs journalism it can trust.
This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.
For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.
Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.
We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.
If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.