‘Is Marco Calling Her a Liar?’: Karoline Leavitt Swore Trump Didn’t Do What Everyone Watched on Camera — Then Rubio Opened His Mouth and the Whole Story Imploded

Secretary of State Marco Rubio‘s Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s confidence betrayed him as he moved through Wednesday’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.

Rubio answered questions with ease and at times breezily but remained unaware that one offhand explanation would reopen an issue the White House, and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt in particular, appeared to believe had already been put to rest.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt talks with Secretary of State Marco Rubio during an Oval Office press availability with U.S. President Donald Trump on August 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The hearing, expected to focus narrowly on U.S. policy toward Venezuela, quickly widened as Democrats pressed Rubio on President Donald Trump’s recent comments abroad, his tone toward NATO allies, and the administration’s increasingly strained messaging on the world stage.

When pressed on Trump’s fixation with Greenland and his repeated references to Greenland as Iceland, Rubio blew a hole right through the administration’s carefully maintained story.

‘OMG! Right There, He Had a Glitch!’: Trump Tries to Run a No-Questions Presser — Miscalculates One Detail, Can’t Shut It Down Fast Enough, and Freezes As Room Erupts

The moment unfolded when Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine pressed Rubio on Trump’s recent speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Trump had talked at length about a place he called Iceland — even though the context made clear he was talking about Greenland.

Kaine laid it out plainly, quoting Trump’s own words back to him: “Here’s what something the president said in Davos: ‘I’m helping NATO until the last few days, when I told them about Iceland, they loved me. They’re not here for us on Iceland. That I can tell you. Our stock market took the first dip yesterday because of Iceland. So Iceland has already cost us a lot of money.’” 

Kaine then asked the obvious follow-up: “The president repeatedly mistook Iceland for Greenland, right? We’re not mad at Iceland. They haven’t cost us any money. The president just mistook the two countries for each other, correct?”

Rubio’s response: “Yeah, he meant to say Greenland, but I think we’re all familiar with presidents that have verbal stumbles. We’ve had presidents like that before. Some made a lot more than this one.”

Kaine didn’t let it slide. “Nice try.”

During the exchange, Rubio did something that Leavitt had refused to do: he acknowledged the president’s mistake outright. By saying Trump “meant to say Greenland,” Rubio effectively undercut days of denials from Leavitt — denials that had already triggered ridicule, fact checks and growing distrust.

Online, critics immediately piled on. One commenter pointed out a broader concern: “The next question is ‘if the Press Secretary lies about something as trivial as that, how can we trust what she says about anything?’” 

Others mocked Rubio for not getting on script.

“Leavitt and Rubio did not coordinate on their l i e s,” wrote one reader while another added, “That’s not what Karoline said Marco!”

Another asked on X, “But Leavitt said that wasn’t true. Is Marco calling her a liar?”

Online reactions followed Leavitt’s insistence that Trump never confused Iceland and Greenland at all — despite video, transcripts and widespread reporting showing otherwise.

After Trump’s fumble in Davos, NewsNation correspondent Libbey Dean noted on X that “President Trump appeared to mix up Greenland and Iceland around three times.”

Leavitt fired back: “No he didn’t, Libby. His written remarks referred to Greenland as a ‘piece of ice’ because that’s what it is.” She added, “You’re the only one mixing anything up here.”

The problem was that viewers had watched the speech for themselves and unmistakably heard Trump refer to Iceland.

According to the official transcript published by the World Economic Forum, Trump referred to Iceland four times in passages clearly dealing with Greenland. The Associated Press livestream shows the same thing, with the mix-ups occurring at multiple points in the speech.

Commenters reacted sharply to Leavitt’s denial. 

“I’m not sure how many people watched Trump’s incoherent speech but I’m sure it’s in the 10s of millions,” Jon Wiltshire wrote on X. “Leavitt just plain lying here as on numerous occasions he referred to Greenland as Iceland. She’s pathetic.” 

Another reaction put it even more plainly: “Karoline Leavitt expects us to believe that Trump didn’t say ‘Iceland’ instead of ‘Greenland,’ like we didn’t all watch this video of him saying Iceland. ICELAND. He did not say A PIECE OF ICE. The dork said ICELAND.”

The issue drew enough attention that fact-checkers stepped in. Snopes confirmed that Trump did, in fact, confuse the two places during the speech. Despite that, Leavitt doubled down, pointing only to Trump’s prepared text rather than his spoken words.

Asked later why Leavitt would deny something so easily verified, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers offered a statement that sidestepped the question entirely: “President Trump delivered a historic speech in Davos laying out America’s compelling national security interests involving Greenland. Mere hours afterward, President Trump announced the framework for a future deal with respect to Greenland. President Trump continues to deliver results while the failing, liberal media melts down.”

The statement didn’t explain the motivation behind denying what millions of people saw and heard. It also didn’t address why Rubio, when confronted directly, chose to acknowledge the error instead of sticking to the party line.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top