Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg upset a lot of people when he appeared to support Donald Trump at his inauguration for his second term, and his latest move is also drawing strong criticism.
The billionaire hired a new president and vice chair of Meta, the parent company that operates Instagram, WhatsApp, and Facebook, and many were surprised by Zuckerberg’s choice.
Mark Zuckerberg hires a former Donald Trump official to head Meta. Photo credit: Chris Unger / Zuffa LLC via Getty Images; Samuel Corum / Getty Images
Zuckerberg hired Dina Powell McCormick, Trump’s former deputy national security adviser, who will be the company’s vice chair and president. McCormick previously worked as a partner at Goldman Sachs.
The new Meta executive has also worked under other Republicans aside from Trump, including her role as an assistant secretary under former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during the George W. Bush administration, and her new job at the social media company is raising eyebrows.
Trump took to Truth Social to praise the decision in his signature format.
“Congratulations to DINA POWELL MCCORMICK, WHO HAS JUST BEEN NAMED THE NEWPRESIDENT OF META,” he wrote. “A great choice by Mark ZIl! She is a fantastic, and very talented, person, who served the Trump Administration with strength and distinction! President DJT.”
Trump’s comment was shared on Threads with the caption, “I’m not shocked anymore, but consistently appalled,” and users replied in the comment section.
One user notified Zuckerberg that Trump’s boasting about Meta’s new hire could bring questions about the president’s influence on free speech. McCormick is also married to Republican Pennsylvania state Sen. Dave McCormick.
“@zuck, maybe you should tell him not to post this,” they wrote. “It makes you look really bad.”
Several people wrote that they were leaving Meta for Bluesky over Zuckerberg’s right-wing hire. “We need to get the hell off META. It’s time. I’m heading to Bluesky. Enough is enough.”
“This is Senator McCormick’s wife,” noted another. “I wonder if she is there to make changes to try and affect the platform as it relates to our elections. Let me go take a look at Bluesky.”
One user seemed concerned that folks’ accounts would be targeted if they didn’t share Trump’s views. “She is no doubt a trump supporter and will deactivate anyone’s account who doesn’t kneel before Trump,” added one.
One user suggested that Zuckerberg sold his soul, just as Twitter founder Jack Dorsey did with selling to Elon Musk. “Mark sold his soul to the orange devil too.”
Folks have been critical of Zuckerberg’s recent embrace of conservative views on the platform after Trump survived an attempt on his life at a MAGA rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024. The 41-year-old called it “one of the most badass things I’ve ever seen in my life.”
With Zuckerberg’s hiring of Trump’s former deputy national security adviser, it sure seems like folks have good reason to be concerned.
Democracy needs journalism it can trust.
This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.
For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.
Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.
We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.
If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.