‘Do Not Contradict the President’: Stephen Miller’s Wife Ordered the Head of the Social Security Administration to Lie to Back Up Elon Musk’s Claims of Massive Phone Fraud at the Agency

The wife of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller demanded that the acting head of the Social Security Administration back up claims by billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk of massive phone fraud at the agency.

Former White aide Katie Miller, who exited the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, last month to work full-time for Musk, ordered acting SSA chief Leland Dudek to publicly repeat claims that 40 percent of all calls made to the agency’s customer service phone line involved some form of fraud or attempted scam, according to reporting from The New York Times.

Miller reportedly told Dudek, “The number is 40 percent,” in a phone call on April 1.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff for policy and US Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller (L) and his wife Katie Miller attend the Congressional Picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) / ALTERNATE CROP (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

“Do not contradict the president,” she said. Miller demanded that Dudek toe the line even though staff at the agency tried to correct the figure in a memo on April 1, the Times reported, the same day Miller made the phone call to Dudek.

The false claim that 40 percent of all calls to the administration involved fraud or attempted fraud apparently originated from a misinterpretation of data.

The Times reported that the 40 percent number is a “distortion of a completely different statistic” involving calls by purported scammers trying to steal money by changing bank account information.

The real statistic is 25 to 30 percent of all phone calls related to changing direct deposit accounts are made by potential fraudsters, not 40 percent of all calls made to the agency. That’s a very different number. Yet it’s part of the claims Musk made earlier this year as the head of DOGE for taking a sledgehammer to staffing and making other cuts at the administration, as DOGE scooped up the personal data of millions of Americans.

“Throughout the early months of this Trump presidency, Musk & allies systematically built a false narrative of widespread fraud at Social Security based on misinterpreted data, using their claims to gain access to personal information on millions of Americans” – NYT,” New York Times reporter Trip Gabriel posted on social media.

Almost 69 million Americans rely on Social Security benefits, including retired and disabled workers and their dependents and survivors. That’s according to the Social Security Administration, which also reports nearly nine out of 10 people 65 and older received Social Security benefits as of Dec. 31, 2024.

A review by the digital news site Nextgov/FCW shows that less than one percent of all calls to the Social Security Administration involve potential fraud

But that didn’t stop MAGA supporters from voicing their outrage at the Times reporting.

“People with a brain know The NY Times is not objective and does whatever it can to make the Trump administration look bad!” an X user wrote.

“Well, if the left wing communists at The NY Times say so… lol,” another user posted.

Social security dates back to 1935 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law. The legislation was a direct response to the devastating hardships and economic poverty of the Great Depression. The benefits program paid for out of payroll taxes is a vital source, and some cases the only source, of income for millions of older Americans.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top