‘Is That a Robe?’: Woman Caught Making PB&J Sandwich During Zoom Court Hearing Booted from Call After Judge Scolds Her for Being Underdressed

A Detroit woman explained why she was late for her Zoom court hearing, where a judge chastised her after she was caught making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in a house robe.

A now-viral clip of the virtual hearing shows Asja Outerbridge dialing in late for the video conference call to appear before Judge Sean Perkins.

In the clip, the judge asks why she’s late, and Outerbridge states that she was sent a letter stating she was supposed to show up at court at 1 p.m. She held up a piece of paper that showed her hearing was scheduled for 9 a.m.

'Is That a Robe?': Woman Caught Making PB&J Sandwich During Zoom Court Hearing Booted from Call After Judge Scolds Her for Being Underdressed
A Detroit-area woman makes a sandwich during a court hearing. (Photos: Instagram/Metro Detroit News)

As she and the judge argue about the correct time, talking over one another, Outerbridge sets the phone down and shows herself scooping peanut butter from a jar while dressed in a robe.

“Put whatever you are trying to prepare down,” Perkins says over the call. “Put your properly dress on. I don’t do robes.”

“I am properly dressed. I have on a T-shirt,” Outerbridge responds.

“Is that a robe?” the judge asks.

Outerbridge explains that she was trying to feed her sick daughter, whom she had to keep home from school. As Perkins begins to talk about court etiquette, Outerbridge attests she is properly clothed and takes off the robe to reveal that she’s wearing an oversized T-shirt with leopard-print pants.

Visibly frustrated with the exchange, Perkins dismissed Outerbridge, saying, “Bye, Ms. Outerbridge!” and booted her off the call.

According to WJBK, Outerbridge had to report to court for a misdemeanor after she was accused of having an open container of alcohol in her car.

She said there was a reasonable explanation for why she was late to her hearing.

“I got multiple court dates, so I called to get the Zoom number, and they had told me like, ‘Oh, you’re supposed to be there right now.’ What I had said 1 p.m.,” Outerbridge told CBS News Detroit. “I hung up with them, and hopped on at 9:22 a.m. exactly, and waited there from 9:22 to 11:30. That’s when the robe thing happened, and then he put me back in holding. So with being on hold for 2 hours, I’m not going to lie, I kind of forgot he was on the phone.”

Outerbridge said that once she heard the court session start, she ran to her phone, but she had already started making a sandwich.

“I definitely was wrong. I could have came dressed better and more prepared, and I don’t want to judge to think that I’m laughing at the situation, at him because I’m not. I take that very seriously, I do genuinely, with a serious face, apologize to the judge,” she said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top