‘You Don’t Like Us’: Donald Trump Supporter Hurls Racial Slur, Claims Gun Control Law Is Retaliation Against White People Who Voted for the President-Elect During Michigan Senate Hearing

White grievance, amplified and exploited by President-elect Donald Trump, continues to rear its irrational head, and not just on issues related to race.

In Michigan, a contentious debate over whether to expand a ban on the concealed carry of firearms in the state Capitol was hijacked Thursday by a gun advocate and far-right provocateur who dropped the N-word during public comments on the legislation.

Avi Rachlin, whose X feed is replete with misplaced victimhood and racist tropes, argued the bill, which would expand the ban to lawmaker’s offices, unfairly targets whites.

Donald Trump Supporter Hurls Racial Slur, Claims Gun Control Law Is Retailation Against White People Who Voted for the President-Elect During Michigan Senate Hearing
Avi Rachlin speaks during a Michigan Senate hearing. (Photo: X/avsterbone)

“It is racial, because the people who carry in the Capitol are primarily white people who have [concealed pistol licenses], are primarily white, and this is retaliation for the only demographic that overwhelmingly voted to support Donald Trump,” Rachlin said. “And that is why it is being taken out on us, because you don’t like us. And that’s how it is.”

Legislation aimed at gun violence should instead focus on “the people who bring guns into communities and shoot people like where I live in Detroit and where you represent Stephanie Chang, which are overwhelmingly 13-44 year old Sub-Saharan African n—–s,” Rachlin said to state Sen. Chang, who presided over the hearing as chair of the Michigan Committee on Civil Rights, Judiciary and Public Safety.

“The idea that this is aimed at white people – I know so many different groups from minority communities that are armed, that carry concealed – it’s just a ridiculous argument,” responded Republican state Sen. Jim Runstead.

Rachlin’s microphone was cut as senators from both parties condemned his use of the racist language.

“The term that you used is inappropriate, and it will not get you anywhere with this Legislature,” said Republican state Sen. Ruth Johnson.

Democratic state Sen. Erika Geiss, who chairs the Michigan Legislative Black Caucus, described the episode as “shocking.”

“And it is sad in 2024 we have to deal with these issues,” she said.

In an interview with Fox 2 in Detroit following the hearing, Chang said Richlin’s use of the epithet shows we do not yet live in a “post-racial society.”

“We were all horrified,” she said. “He was basically insinuating gun violence was because of Black folks. Obviously, that is a very problematic and racist statement. I hope this can be a lesson to folks who are watching that we have a lot to do to combat racism in this society.”

Richlin defended using the racial slur, telling Fox 2, “It segregates (the violent offenders) from the Black people who don’t do anything.”

While his use of the N-word attracted most of the attention, Richlin’s remarks prior to that should be just as concerning, as white victimhood is poised to emerge as a pillar of Trump’s agenda.

As Axios reported in April, close allies of the president want to “dramatically change the government’s interpretation of Civil Rights-era laws to focus on ‘anti-white racism’ rather than discrimination against people of color.”

Already this week, the president-elect announced his plan to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in America’s colleges and universities that includes a provision requiring financial restitution for those allegedly harmed by such programs — “reparations for white people,” as some have dubbed it.

Trump’s Justice Department is also expected to work to end or at least curb programs in government and corporate America created to provide more opportunities for people victimized by white racism, along with more recent initiatives that followed the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

Subscribe To The ABS Newsletter — Get our stories in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Latest from Atlanta Black Star

Back to top