‘Who Were You Taking Photos Of?’: Texas Judge Dismisses Woman’s Apology for Wearing Shorts, Using Cellphone In Her Courtroom, Promptly Puts Her In Cuffs In Viral Video

A viral video showing a judge’s gruff response to a woman’s apparel and conduct in her courtroom is drawing negative reactions.

The video, posted on TikTok on Sept. 8, shows a clip from a Zoom recording of a court hearing and an interaction between Texas District Court Judge Stephanie Boyd and a woman who appears to be the mother of a defendant.

Viewers can see the woman in a blue blouse and white shorts carrying a cellphone and a tote bag approach the bench.

No-Nonsense Judge Leaves Woman Stunned for Lack of Decorum in Her Courtroom, but Video Critics Bash Her for ‘Ridiculously Harsh’ Response
Video screenshot from Tiktok video. (TikTok/briannaminnie0)

“Why are you in this court in shorts?” Judge Boyd brusquely asks.

“I’m sorry, I just … I’ve never really been in court,” the woman states.

The judge asks her to hand her phone over to the deputy in court, then asks that deputy to delete a photo the woman had taken in the courtroom.

“OK, who were you taking photos of?” the judge asks.

“Oh, I was just letting my daughter know my son’s OK,” the woman states.

“No, who were you taking photos of?” the judge asks again.

“My son, Rick,” the woman admits.

“Alright, so Deputy Lord, if you put her in cuffs, since you want to be next to her son, put her in the box,” the judge orders.

“I apologize, ma’am, I didn’t know,” the woman says.

“I do appreciate your apology,” the judge responds.

Judge Boyd, first elected to her position in the Texas 187th District Court in 2019, is known online for her candor and frank conduct in criminal court proceedings she oversees.

The video of her interaction with the woman garnered 17 million views. It’s unclear what the hearing was for, but in this case, many commenters found fault with Boyd’s responses and thought she came down hard on the woman.

“That seemed ridiculously harsh,” one commenter wrote. “The judge is way out of line,” another person said.

“There’s an expected level of etiquette in court,” someone else added. “Also, they announce before the judge comes out to put all phones away.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top